Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] MAINTAINERS: clarify some of the tags

[Cornelia Huck]

On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 09:23:27 -0600
Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 11/16/18 9:14 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:

> >>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >>>> @@ -12,9 +12,14 @@ consult qemu-devel and not any specific individual 
> >>>> privately.
> >>>>    Descriptions of section entries:
> >>>>    
> >>>>          M: Mail patches to: FullName <address@hidden>
> >>>> +           Maintainers are looking after a certain area and must be 
> >>>> CCed on
> >>>> +           patches. They are considered the main contact point.  
> >>
> >> Maybe add something along the lines of "However, a maintainer may accept
> >> code that has been reviewed by others without explicitly reviewing it
> >> themselves"?  
> > 
> > I'm not sure whether that adds vital information. If a maintainer picks
> > a patch that has been reviewed by others, they may or may not do a
> > proper review themselves; but the end result is basically the same
> > (patch makes its way into the tree.)  
> 
> Okay. There's also the counter argument that too much text makes it 
> something that no one will want to spend time reading, so leaving things 
> concise is desirable.

We could also write up a more verbose "patch handling and
maintainership guide" or so; but I'd prefer short comments in
MAINTAINERS covering the basics only.

> 
> >> At any rate, I like the idea of adding the additional descriptions for
> >> the categories, even if we still bike-shed on the wording or even the
> >> set of categories to use.  
> > 
> > What about going with this as a starting point?  
> 
> Yes, works for me. We can always add more patches later if desired.

OK, great!

Peter, would you consider picking up this one for 3.1? At the very
least, it has a R-b from Markus already :)