[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width. |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:17:40 +0100 |
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:05:38 +0800
Yu Zhang <address@hidden> wrote:
> Currently, vIOMMU is using the value of IOVA address width, instead of
> the host address width(HAW) to calculate the number of reserved bits in
> data structures such as root entries, context entries, and entries of
> DMA paging structures etc.
>
> However values of IOVA address width and of the HAW may not equal. For
> example, a 48-bit IOVA can only be mapped to host addresses no wider than
> 46 bits. Using 48, instead of 46 to calculate the reserved bit may result
> in an invalid IOVA being accepted.
>
> To fix this, a new field - haw_bits is introduced in struct IntelIOMMUState,
> whose value is initialized based on the maximum physical address set to
> guest CPU.
> Also, definitions such as VTD_HOST_AW_39/48BIT etc. are renamed
> to clarify.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
> ---
[...]
> @@ -3100,6 +3104,8 @@ static void vtd_iommu_replay(IOMMUMemoryRegion
> *iommu_mr, IOMMUNotifier *n)
> static void vtd_init(IntelIOMMUState *s)
> {
> X86IOMMUState *x86_iommu = X86_IOMMU_DEVICE(s);
> + CPUState *cs = first_cpu;
> + X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
>
> memset(s->csr, 0, DMAR_REG_SIZE);
> memset(s->wmask, 0, DMAR_REG_SIZE);
> @@ -3119,23 +3125,24 @@ static void vtd_init(IntelIOMMUState *s)
> s->cap = VTD_CAP_FRO | VTD_CAP_NFR | VTD_CAP_ND |
> VTD_CAP_MAMV | VTD_CAP_PSI | VTD_CAP_SLLPS |
> VTD_CAP_SAGAW_39bit | VTD_CAP_MGAW(s->aw_bits);
> - if (s->aw_bits == VTD_HOST_AW_48BIT) {
> + if (s->aw_bits == VTD_AW_48BIT) {
> s->cap |= VTD_CAP_SAGAW_48bit;
> }
> s->ecap = VTD_ECAP_QI | VTD_ECAP_IRO;
> + s->haw_bits = cpu->phys_bits;
Is it possible to avoid accessing CPU fields directly or cpu altogether
and set phys_bits when iommu is created?
Perhaps Eduardo
can suggest better approach, since he's more familiar with phys_bits topic
> /*
> * Rsvd field masks for spte
> */
> vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[0] = ~0ULL;
> - vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[1] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
> - vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[2] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
> - vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[3] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
> - vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[4] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
> - vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[5] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
> - vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[6] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
> - vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[7] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
> - vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[8] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
> + vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[1] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
> + vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[2] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
> + vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[3] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
> + vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[4] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
> + vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[5] =
> VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
> + vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[6] =
> VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
> + vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[7] =
> VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
> + vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[8] =
> VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
>
> if (x86_iommu->intr_supported) {
> s->ecap |= VTD_ECAP_IR | VTD_ECAP_MHMV;
> @@ -3261,10 +3268,10 @@ static bool vtd_decide_config(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> Error **errp)
> }
>
> /* Currently only address widths supported are 39 and 48 bits */
> - if ((s->aw_bits != VTD_HOST_AW_39BIT) &&
> - (s->aw_bits != VTD_HOST_AW_48BIT)) {
> + if ((s->aw_bits != VTD_AW_39BIT) &&
> + (s->aw_bits != VTD_AW_48BIT)) {
> error_setg(errp, "Supported values for x-aw-bits are: %d, %d",
> - VTD_HOST_AW_39BIT, VTD_HOST_AW_48BIT);
> + VTD_AW_39BIT, VTD_AW_48BIT);
> return false;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> index ed4e758..820451c 100644
> --- a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> +++ b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> @@ -47,9 +47,9 @@
> #define VTD_SID_TO_DEVFN(sid) ((sid) & 0xff)
>
> #define DMAR_REG_SIZE 0x230
> -#define VTD_HOST_AW_39BIT 39
> -#define VTD_HOST_AW_48BIT 48
> -#define VTD_HOST_ADDRESS_WIDTH VTD_HOST_AW_39BIT
> +#define VTD_AW_39BIT 39
> +#define VTD_AW_48BIT 48
> +#define VTD_ADDRESS_WIDTH VTD_AW_39BIT
> #define VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) ((1ULL << (aw)) - 1)
>
> #define DMAR_REPORT_F_INTR (1)
> @@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ struct IntelIOMMUState {
> bool intr_eime; /* Extended interrupt mode enabled */
> OnOffAuto intr_eim; /* Toggle for EIM cabability */
> bool buggy_eim; /* Force buggy EIM unless eim=off */
> - uint8_t aw_bits; /* Host/IOVA address width (in bits) */
> + uint8_t aw_bits; /* IOVA address width (in bits) */
> + uint8_t haw_bits; /* Hardware address width (in bits) */
>
> /*
> * Protects IOMMU states in general. Currently it protects the
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] intel-iommu: add support for 5-level virtual IOMMU., Yu Zhang, 2018/12/12
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/12/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width.,
Igor Mammedov <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Igor Mammedov, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/12/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/12/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Igor Mammedov, 2018/12/19