qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/25] pci, pc, virtio: fixes, cleanups, features


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/25] pci, pc, virtio: fixes, cleanups, features
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:24:54 -0500

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 02:15:36PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 2/12/19 2:04 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:39:21AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >> On 2/12/19 8:11 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:06:42AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> OK I reverted the whole part dealing with vhost-user and reposted.
> >>>
> >>> I noticed that the merged pull request could possibly have squashed
> >>> the below two patches (in previous pull) into one super patch
> >>> (a56de056c91f87e1e):
> >>>
> >>>         i386/kvm: ignore masked irqs when update msi routes
> >>>         contrib/vhost-user-blk: fix the compilation issue
> >>>
> >>> Here, the first patch lost its commit message, and the last patch lost
> >>> its real author. ;)
> >>
> >> I suggest we revert a56de056c9 ASAP and reapply the both patches, this
> >> will ease cherry-picking/downstream workflow.
> > 
> > I don't see why does it help upstream.
> 
> I'd have suggested the same if I had no idea what 'downstream workflow'
> mean, simply to keep the tree clear and avoid to have unrelated changes
> squashed altogether.
> Commit a56de056c9 really looks messy. MSI/MSIX changes described by "fix
> vhost-user-blk compilation".
> Hopefully it won't trigger any problem which requires bisecting to it,
> then contact Changpeng Liu asking him what he intented to do with his
> commit.
> Your call anyway :)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Phil.


OK these are good points. I'm not sure what happened but it looks like I
screwed up when resolving some conflicts.  Care posting a patchset
looking sane?

-- 
MST



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]