qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU and vIOMMU support for emulated VF passthrough to


From: Peter Xu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU and vIOMMU support for emulated VF passthrough to nested (L2) VM
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 10:40:18 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 03:41:10PM +0000, Elijah Shakkour wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Knut Omang <address@hidden>
> > Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 5:24 PM
> > To: Elijah Shakkour <address@hidden>; Peter Xu
> > <address@hidden>
> > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>; Alex Williamson
> > <address@hidden>; Marcel Apfelbaum
> > <address@hidden>; Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>;
> > address@hidden
> > Subject: Re: QEMU and vIOMMU support for emulated VF passthrough to
> > nested (L2) VM
> > 
> > On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 14:01 +0000, Elijah Shakkour wrote:
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
> > > > Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 1:25 PM
> > > > To: Elijah Shakkour <address@hidden>
> > > > Cc: Knut Omang <address@hidden>; Michael S. Tsirkin
> > > > <address@hidden>; Alex Williamson <address@hidden>;
> > > > Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>; Stefan Hajnoczi
> > > > <address@hidden>; address@hidden
> > > > Subject: Re: QEMU and vIOMMU support for emulated VF passthrough
> > to
> > > > nested (L2) VM
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 09:12:38AM +0000, Elijah Shakkour wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 5:47 AM
> > > > > > To: Elijah Shakkour <address@hidden>
> > > > > > Cc: Knut Omang <address@hidden>; Michael S. Tsirkin
> > > > > > <address@hidden>; Alex Williamson <address@hidden>;
> > > > > > Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>; Stefan Hajnoczi
> > > > > > <address@hidden>; address@hidden
> > > > > > Subject: Re: QEMU and vIOMMU support for emulated VF
> > passthrough
> > > > to
> > > > > > nested (L2) VM
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 11:15:00AM +0000, Elijah Shakkour wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [...]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I didn't have DMA nor MMIO read/write working with my old
> > > > > > > command
> > > > > > line.
> > > > > > > But, when I removed all CPU flags and only provided "-cpu
> > > > > > > host", I see that
> > > > > > MMIO works.
> > > > > > > Still, DMA read/write from emulated device doesn't work for VF.
> > > > > > > For
> > > > > > example:
> > > > > > > Driver provides me a buffer pointer through MMIO write, this
> > > > > > > address
> > > > > > (pointer) is GPA of L2, and when I try to call pci_dma_read()
> > > > > > with this address I get:
> > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > Unassigned mem read 0000000000000000 "
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't know where this error log was dumped but if it's during
> > > > > > DMA then I agree it can probably be related to vIOMMU.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This log is dumped from:
> > > > > memory.c: unassigned_mem_read()
> > > > >
> > > > > > > As I said, my problem now is in translation of L2 GPA provided
> > > > > > > by driver,
> > > > > > when I call DMA read/write for this address from VF.
> > > > > > > Any insights?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I just noticed that you were using QEMU 2.12 [1].  If that's the
> > > > > > case, please rebase to the latest QEMU, at least >=3.0 because
> > > > > > there's major refactor of the shadow logic during 3.0 devel cycle
> > AFAICT.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Rebased to QEMU 3.1
> > > > > Now I see the address I'm trying to read from in log but still same 
> > > > > error:
> > > > > "
> > > > > Unassigned mem read 00000000f0481000 "
> > > > > What do you suggest?
> > > >
> > > > Would you please answer the questions that Knut asked?  Is it
> > > > working for L1 guest?  How about PF?
> > >
> > > Both VF and PF are working for L1 guest.
> > > I don't know how to passthrough PF to nested VM in hyper-v.
> > 
> > On Linux passing through VFs and PFs are the same.
> > Maybe you can try passthrough with all Linux first? (first PF then VF) ?
> > 
> > > I don't invoke VF manually in hyper-v and pass it through to nested
> > > VM. I use hyper-v manager to configure and provide a VF for nested VM
> > > (I can see the VF only in the nested VM).
> > >
> > > Did someone try to run emulated device in linux RH as nested L2 where
> > > L1 is windows hyper-v? Does DMA read/write work for this emulated
> > device in this case?
> > 
> > I have never tried that, I have only used Linux as L2, Windows might be
> > pickier about what it expects, so starting with Linux to rule that out is
> > probably a good idea.
> 
> Will move to this solution after I/we give up 😊
> 
> > 
> > > >
> > > > You can also try to enable VT-d device log by appending:
> > > >
> > > >   -trace enable="vtd_*"
> > > >
> > > > In case it dumps anything useful for you.
> 
> Here is the relevant dump (dev 01:00.01 is my VF):
> "
> vtd_inv_desc_cc_device context invalidate device 01:00.01
> vtd_ce_not_present Context entry bus 1 devfn 1 not present
> vtd_switch_address_space Device 01:00.1 switching address space (iommu 
> enabled=1)
> vtd_ce_not_present Context entry bus 1 devfn 1 not present
> vtd_err Detected invalid context entry when trying to sync shadow page table

These lines mean that the guest sent a device invalidation to your VF
but the IOMMU found that the device context entry is missing.

> vtd_iotlb_cc_update IOTLB context update bus 0x1 devfn 0x1 high 0x102 low 
> 0x2d007003 gen 0 -> gen 2
> vtd_err_dmar_slpte_resv_error iova 0xf08e7000 level 2 slpte 0x2a54008f7

This line should not exist in latest QEMU.  Are you sure you're using
the latest QEMU?

I agree with Knut that I would suggest you to use use Linux in both
host and guests first to triage the issue.

Regards,

-- 
Peter Xu



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]