qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] migration: avoid filling ignore-shared rambl


From: Catherine Ho
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] migration: avoid filling ignore-shared ramblock when in incoming migration
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 23:21:47 +0800

Hi Peter Xu

On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 10:25, Peter Xu <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:30:01AM -0400, Catherine Ho wrote:
> > Commit 18269069c310 ("migration: Introduce ignore-shared capability")
> > addes ignore-shared capability to bypass the shared ramblock (e,g,
> > membackend + numa node). It does good to live migration.
> >
> > This commit expectes that QEMU doesn't write to guest RAM until
> > VM starts, but it does on aarch64 qemu:
> > Backtrace:
> > 1  0x000055f4a296dd84 in address_space_write_rom_internal () at
> exec.c:3458
> > 2  0x000055f4a296de3a in address_space_write_rom () at exec.c:3479
> > 3  0x000055f4a2d519ff in rom_reset () at hw/core/loader.c:1101
> > 4  0x000055f4a2d475ec in qemu_devices_reset () at hw/core/reset.c:69
> > 5  0x000055f4a2c90a28 in qemu_system_reset () at vl.c:1675
> > 6  0x000055f4a2c9851d in main () at vl.c:4552
> >
> > Actually, on arm64 virt marchine, ramblock "dtb" will be filled into ram
> > during rom_reset. In ignore-shared incoming case, this rom filling
> > is not required since all the data has been stored in memory backend
> file.
> >
> > Fixes: commit 18269069c310 ("migration: Introduce ignore-shared
> capability")
> > Signed-off-by: Catherine Ho <address@hidden>
> > Suggested-by: Yury Kotov <address@hidden>
>
> (note: IIUC normally you should have your signed-off to be the last
>  line before the suggested-by :)
>
> About the patch content, I have had a question on whether we should
> need to check ignore-shared at all... That question lies in:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10859889/#22546487
>
> And if my understanding was correct above, IMHO the patch could be as
> simply be as "if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE)) return;" at [1]
> below.
>
>
Thanks, but I thought this method would break the x86 rom_reset logic during
RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE.
Please see the debugging patch and log lines below:
diff --git a/hw/core/loader.c b/hw/core/loader.c
index fe5cb24122..b0c871af26 100644
--- a/hw/core/loader.c
+++ b/hw/core/loader.c
@@ -1086,8 +1086,9 @@ int rom_add_option(const char *file, int32_t
bootindex)
 static void rom_reset(void *unused)
 {
     Rom *rom;
-
     QTAILQ_FOREACH(rom, &roms, next) {
+        if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE))
+           printf("rom name=%s\n",rom->name);
         if (rom->fw_file) {
             continue;
         }

rom name=kvmvapic.bin
rom name=linuxboot_dma.bin
rom name=bios-256k.bin
rom name=etc/acpi/tables
rom name=etc/table-loader
rom name=etc/acpi/rsdp

B.R.
Catherine

> Thanks,
>
> > ---
> >  hw/core/loader.c          | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >  include/exec/cpu-common.h |  1 +
> >  migration/ram.c           |  2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/core/loader.c b/hw/core/loader.c
> > index fe5cb24122..861a03335b 100644
> > --- a/hw/core/loader.c
> > +++ b/hw/core/loader.c
> > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> >  #include "hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h"
> >  #include "exec/memory.h"
> >  #include "exec/address-spaces.h"
> > +#include "exec/cpu-common.h"
> >  #include "hw/boards.h"
> >  #include "qemu/cutils.h"
> >
> > @@ -1086,6 +1087,9 @@ int rom_add_option(const char *file, int32_t
> bootindex)
> >  static void rom_reset(void *unused)
> >  {
> >      Rom *rom;
> > +    MemoryRegion *mr;
> > +    hwaddr hw_addr;
> > +    hwaddr l;
>
> [1]
>
> >
> >      QTAILQ_FOREACH(rom, &roms, next) {
> >          if (rom->fw_file) {
> > @@ -1094,6 +1098,17 @@ static void rom_reset(void *unused)
> >          if (rom->data == NULL) {
> >              continue;
> >          }
> > +
> > +        /* bypass the rom blob in ignore-shared migration case*/
> > +        if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE)) {
> > +            rcu_read_lock();
> > +            mr = address_space_translate(rom->as, rom->addr, &hw_addr,
> &l,
> > +                                         true, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
> > +            rcu_read_unlock();
> > +            if (mr->ram_block != NULL &&
> ramblock_is_ignored(mr->ram_block))
> > +                continue;
> > +        }
> > +
> >          if (rom->mr) {
> >              void *host = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(rom->mr);
> >              memcpy(host, rom->data, rom->datasize);
> > diff --git a/include/exec/cpu-common.h b/include/exec/cpu-common.h
> > index cef8b88a2a..c80b7248a6 100644
> > --- a/include/exec/cpu-common.h
> > +++ b/include/exec/cpu-common.h
> > @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ void *qemu_ram_get_host_addr(RAMBlock *rb);
> >  ram_addr_t qemu_ram_get_offset(RAMBlock *rb);
> >  ram_addr_t qemu_ram_get_used_length(RAMBlock *rb);
> >  bool qemu_ram_is_shared(RAMBlock *rb);
> > +bool ramblock_is_ignored(RAMBlock *block);
> >  bool qemu_ram_is_uf_zeroable(RAMBlock *rb);
> >  void qemu_ram_set_uf_zeroable(RAMBlock *rb);
> >  bool qemu_ram_is_migratable(RAMBlock *rb);
> > diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> > index 35bd6213e9..d6de9d335d 100644
> > --- a/migration/ram.c
> > +++ b/migration/ram.c
> > @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ out:
> >      return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > -static bool ramblock_is_ignored(RAMBlock *block)
> > +bool ramblock_is_ignored(RAMBlock *block)
> >  {
> >      return !qemu_ram_is_migratable(block) ||
> >             (migrate_ignore_shared() && qemu_ram_is_shared(block));
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Peter Xu
>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]