qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Possibly incorrect data sparsification by qemu-img


From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Possibly incorrect data sparsification by qemu-img
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 08:58:37 +0000

29.04.2019 10:27, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 09:19:17AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 24.04.2019 um 08:40 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
>>> 23.04.2019 18:08, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> > Am 23.04.2019 um 16:26 hat Martin Kletzander geschrieben:
>>> >> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 02:12:18PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> >>> Am 23.04.2019 um 13:30 hat Martin Kletzander geschrieben:
>>> >>>> Hi,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I am using qemu-img with nbdkit to transfer a disk image and the 
>>> >>>> update it with
>>> >>>> extra data from newer snapshots.  The end image cannot be transferred 
>>> >>>> because
>>> >>>> the snapshots will be created later than the first transfer and we 
>>> >>>> want to save
>>> >>>> some time up front.  You might think of it as a continuous 
>>> >>>> synchronisation.  It
>>> >>>> looks something like this:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I first transfer the whole image:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>   qemu-img convert -p $nbd disk.raw
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Where `$nbd` is something along the lines of 
>>> >>>> `nbd+unix:///?socket=nbdkit.sock`
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Then, after the next snapshot is created, I can update it thanks to 
>>> >>>> the `-n`
>>> >>>> parameter (the $nbd now points to the newer snapshot with unchanged 
>>> >>>> data looking
>>> >>>> like holes in the file):
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>   qemu-img convert -p -n $nbd disk.raw
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> This is fast and efficient as it uses block status nbd extension, so 
>>> >>>> it only
>>> >>>> transfers new data.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> This is an implementation detail. Don't rely on it. What you're doing is
>>> >>> abusing 'qemu-img convert', so problems like what you describe are to be
>>> >>> expected.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> This can be done over and over again to keep the local
>>> >>>> `disk.raw` image up to date with the latest remote snapshot.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> However, when the guest OS zeroes some of the data and it gets written 
>>> >>>> into the
>>> >>>> snapshot, qemu-img scans for those zeros and does not write them to the
>>> >>>> destination image.  Checking the output of `qemu-img map --output=json 
>>> >>>> $nbd`
>>> >>>> shows that the zeroed data is properly marked as `data: true`.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Using `-S 0` would write zeros even where the holes are, effectively 
>>> >>>> overwriting
>>> >>>> the data from the last snapshot even though they should not be changed.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Having gone through some workarounds I would like there to be another 
>>> >>>> way.  I
>>> >>>> know this is far from the typical usage of qemu-img, but is this 
>>> >>>> really the
>>> >>>> expected behaviour or is this just something nobody really needed 
>>> >>>> before?  If it
>>> >>>> is the former, would it be possible to have a parameter that would 
>>> >>>> control this
>>> >>>> behaviour?  If the latter is the case, can that behaviour be changed 
>>> >>>> so that it
>>> >>>> properly replicates the data when `-n` parameter is used?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Basically the only thing we need is to either:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> 1) write zeros where they actually are or
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> 2) turn off explicit sparsification without requesting dense image 
>>> >>>> (basically
>>> >>>>     sparsify only the par that is reported as hole on the source) or
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> 3) ideally, just FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE in places where source did 
>>> >>>> report data,
>>> >>>>     but qemu-img found they are all zeros (or source reported 
>>> >>>>HOLE+ZERO which, I
>>> >>>>     believe, is effectively the same)
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> If you want to try this out, I found the easiest reproducible way is 
>>> >>>> using
>>> >>>> nbdkit's data plugin, which can simulate whatever source image you 
>>> >>>> like.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I think what you _really_ want is a commit block job. The problem is
>>> >>> just that you don't have a proper backing file chain, but just a bunch
>>> >>> of NBD connections.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Can't you get an NBD connection that already provides the condensed form
>>> >>> of the whole snapshot chain directly at the source? If the NBD server
>>> >>> was QEMU, this would actually be easier than providing each snapshot
>>> >>> individually.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> If this isn't possible, I think you need to replicate the backing chain
>>> >>> on the destination instead of converting into the same image again and
>>> >>> again so that qemu-img knows that it must take existing data of the
>>> >>> backing file into consideration:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>     qemu-img convert -O qcow2 nbd://... base.qcow2
>>> >>>     qemu-img convert -O qcow2 -F qcow2 -B base.qcow2 nbd://... 
>>> >>>overlay1.qcow2
>>> >>>     qemu-img convert -O qcow2 -F qcow2 -B overlay1.qcow2 nbd://... 
>>> >>>overlay2.qcow2
>>> >>>     ...
>>>
> 
> So I spoke too soon.  This approach fixed the one thing that I was struggling 
> with, but broke the rest, because it completely replicates the last image 
> even when the source provides proper allocation data.  Best to show with an 
> illustration:
> 
>   $ rm -f disk.img snap.img
>   $ dd if=/dev/urandom of=disk.img bs=2M count=1
>   $ dd if=/dev/zero of=snap.img bs=1M count=1
>   $ truncate -s 2M snap.img
>   $ qemu-img map --output=json snap.img
>   [{ "start": 0, "length": 1048576, "depth": 0, "zero": false, "data": true, 
> "offset": 0},
>   { "start": 1048576, "length": 1048576, "depth": 0, "zero": true, "data": 
> false, "offset": 1048576}]
>   $ qemu-img convert -f raw -O qcow2 disk.img disk.qcow2
>   $ qemu-img convert -f raw -O qcow2 -B disk.qcow2 snap.img snap.qcow2
>   $ qemu-img convert -f qcow2 -O raw snap.qcow2 output.raw
>   $ hexdump -C output.raw
>   00000000  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  
> |................|
>   *
>   00200000
> 


Raw file holes and qcow2 unallocated clusters are not the same thing. Raw holes 
are reported
as zero=true (as we see in map output), and this considered "allocated" in 
terms of backing-chain.
And convert will mark corresponding clusters to be ZERO (not UNALLOCATED) in 
target qcow2.

But when you export qcow2 with unallocated clusters through NBD, unallocated 
clusters should be
reported as zero=false data=false, and qemu-img will convert them to 
UNALLOCATED (not ZERO)
clusters in target qcow2 and it should work.

In qcow2 ZERO and UNALLOCATED clusters works like this:
ZERO: on write - allocate clusters and write data, on read - return zeroes
UNALLOCATED: on write -allocate clusters and write data, on read - read from 
backing file if we have it, otherwise return zeroes


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]