[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.1 v2 31/36] cpu: Introduce CPUNegativeOffs
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.1 v2 31/36] cpu: Introduce CPUNegativeOffsetState |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Apr 2019 15:43:11 +0100 |
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 23:35, Richard Henderson
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Nothing in there so far, but all of the plumbing done
> within the target ArchCPU state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
> +/*
> + * This structure must be placed in ArchCPU immedately
> + * before CPUArchState, as a field named "neg".
> + */
> +typedef struct CPUNegativeOffsetState {
> + /* Empty */
> +} CPUNegativeOffsetState;
It would be nice if we could do a compile-time assert that
offsetof(CPUArchState, neg) + sizeof(CPUNegativeOffsetState)
== offsetof(CPUArchState, env)
but I guess the possibility of within-struct padding
between the two structs makes that dubious. Or does our
generated code rely on there being no padding between neg
and env anyway ?
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
thanks
-- PMM
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.1 v2 31/36] cpu: Introduce CPUNegativeOffsetState,
Peter Maydell <=