[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-discuss] bridged ICMP with no replies for tap0 on linux host
From: |
Kate F |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-discuss] bridged ICMP with no replies for tap0 on linux host |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Oct 2014 16:39:53 +0100 |
On 4 October 2014 08:51, <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 12:05:18AM +0100, Kate F wrote:
>
>> tap0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr aa:26:97:82:c6:f1
>> inet addr:100.64.0.57 Bcast:100.64.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>
> Are there any more routing table entries / interfaces on the host with
> addresses assigned from the same subnet? It sounds like the ping reply
> might be getting sent via an unexpected interface.
>
>
> David
Ah! I'd missed that. There was indeed a spurious routing entry to
another interface.
That was because I usually have tap0 bridged to other interfaces. I
thought I'd removed tap0 from the bridge (br0 on the host) so that I
could test this without anything interfering, but I accidently left
tap0 added to br0.
Just for reference in the future: My error was that some other
interface on that bridge had an IP. In Linux, as I understand,
interfaces added to a bridge should not themselves have IPs (which is
what creates unwanted routing entries). Although it is okay for br0
itself to have an IP.
Thanks,
--
Kate