qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 2/2] Fix return value of vga initlization on pp


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 2/2] Fix return value of vga initlization on ppc
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 10:43:59 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0

Il 07/03/2014 10:37, Mark Wu ha scritto:
> Before spapr_vga_init will returned false if the vga is specified by
> the command '-device VGA' because vga_interface_type was evaluated to
> VGA_NONE. With the change in previous patch of this series,
> spapr_vga_init should return true if it's told that the vga will be
> initialized in flow of the generic devices initialization.
> 
> This patch also makes two cleanups:
> 1. skip initialization for VGA_NONE
> 2. remove the useless 'break'

I think that after this patch, "-nodefaults -device VGA" will get a USB 
controller that it didn't get before.

Perhaps this in vl.c:

bool usb_enabled(bool default_usb)
{
    return qemu_opt_get_bool(qemu_get_machine_opts(), "usb", default_usb);
}

should be

bool usb_enabled(bool default_usb)
{
    return qemu_opt_get_bool(qemu_get_machine_opts(), "usb",
                             !no_defaults && default_usb);
}

?

Thanks,

Paolo

> Signed-off-by: Mark Wu <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 93d02c1..4d0ac56 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -765,13 +765,15 @@ static int spapr_vga_init(PCIBus *pci_bus)
>  {
>      switch (vga_interface_type) {
>      case VGA_NONE:
> +        return false;
> +    case VGA_DEVICE:
> +        return true;
>      case VGA_STD:
>          return pci_vga_init(pci_bus) != NULL;
>      default:
>          fprintf(stderr, "This vga model is not supported,"
>                  "currently it only supports -vga std\n");
>          exit(0);
> -        break;
>      }
>  }
>  
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]