qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 1/2] KVM: remove NULL return path for vcpu ids


From: Greg Kurz
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 1/2] KVM: remove NULL return path for vcpu ids >= KVM_MAX_VCPUS
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:30:07 +0200

On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:17:29 +0200
David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:

> > Commit c896939f7cff ("KVM: use heuristic for fast VCPU lookup by id") added
> > a return path that prevents vcpu ids to exceed KVM_MAX_VCPUS. This is a
> > problem for powerpc where vcpu ids can grow up to 8*KVM_MAX_VCPUS.
> > 
> > This patch simply reverses the logic so that we only try fast path if the
> > vcpu id can be tried as an index in kvm->vcpus[]. The slow path is not
> > affected by the change.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/kvm_host.h |    7 ++++---
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > index 5276fe0916fc..23bfe1bd159c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -447,12 +447,13 @@ static inline struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_get_vcpu(struct 
> > kvm *kvm, int i)
> > 
> >  static inline struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(struct kvm *kvm, int id)
> >  {
> > -   struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> > +   struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL;
> >     int i;
> > 
> > -   if (id < 0 || id >= KVM_MAX_VCPUS)
> > +   if (id < 0)
> >             return NULL;
> > -   vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, id);
> > +   if (id < KVM_MAX_VCPUS)
> > +           vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, id);  
> 
> Maybe this check even should go into kvm_get_vcpu()
> 

Yeah possibly, but there are 19 users for kvm_get_vcpu() and I'm not sure if
none of them is on a hot path where this extra check could hurt... maybe this
can be done in a cleanup patch afterwards ?

> >     if (vcpu && vcpu->vcpu_id == id)
> >             return vcpu;
> >     kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
> >   
> 
> Anyhow,
> 
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
> 
> David

Thanks for the review !

Cheers.

--
Greg




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]