qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 2/8] exec: don't use cpu_index to detect if cpu_ex


From: Eduardo Habkost
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 2/8] exec: don't use cpu_index to detect if cpu_exec_init()'s been called for cpu
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 17:46:40 -0300
User-agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:32:48AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 05:54:33PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Instead use QTAIL's tqe_prev field to detect if cpu's been
> > placed in list by cpu_exec_init() which is always set if
> > QTAIL element is in list.
> > 
> > Fixes SIGSEGV on failure path in case cpu_index is assigned
> > by board and cpu.relalize() fails before cpu_exec_init() is called.
> > 
> > In follow up patches, cpu_index will be assigned by boards that
> > support cpu hot(un)plug and need stable cpu_index that doesn't
> > depend on order cpus are created/removed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > Reported-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> 
> Looks correct, although I wonder a bit about changing QTAILQ_REMOVE()
> for everyone for the sake of this one use case.

I don't mind changing it, but it's better to do it as a separate
patch so it can get the attention from other people. There are a
few cases where code checks tqe_prev directly and I don't know
how it could affect them.

Considering we don't want to take too long to include those
changes, I think we should add the tqe_prev=NULL assignment to
cpu_exec_exit() first (it's not the first time we do this in QEMU
code, see commit f8aa905a), and propose moving it to
QTAILQ_REMOVE later (and give it enough time for people to review
it).

> 
> > ---
> >  include/qemu/queue.h | 2 ++
> >  exec.c               | 4 ++--
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/qemu/queue.h b/include/qemu/queue.h
> > index c2b6c81..2c2c74b 100644
> > --- a/include/qemu/queue.h
> > +++ b/include/qemu/queue.h
> > @@ -407,6 +407,7 @@ struct {                                                
> >                 \
> >          else                                                            \
> >                  (head)->tqh_last = (elm)->field.tqe_prev;               \
> >          *(elm)->field.tqe_prev = (elm)->field.tqe_next;                 \
> > +        (elm)->field.tqe_prev = NULL;                                   \
> >  } while (/*CONSTCOND*/0)
> >  
> >  #define QTAILQ_FOREACH(var, head, field)                                \
> > @@ -430,6 +431,7 @@ struct {                                                
> >                 \
> >  #define QTAILQ_EMPTY(head)               ((head)->tqh_first == NULL)
> >  #define QTAILQ_FIRST(head)               ((head)->tqh_first)
> >  #define QTAILQ_NEXT(elm, field)          ((elm)->field.tqe_next)
> > +#define QTAILQ_IN_USE(elm, field)        ((elm)->field.tqe_prev)
> >  
> >  #define QTAILQ_LAST(head, headname) \
> >          (*(((struct headname *)((head)->tqh_last))->tqh_last))
> > diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
> > index 2f57c62..8c5da32 100644
> > --- a/exec.c
> > +++ b/exec.c
> > @@ -643,8 +643,8 @@ void cpu_exec_exit(CPUState *cpu)
> >      CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
> >  
> >      cpu_list_lock();
> > -    if (cpu->cpu_index == -1) {
> > -        /* cpu_index was never allocated by this @cpu or was already 
> > freed. */
> > +    if (!QTAILQ_IN_USE(cpu, node)) {
> > +        /* there is nothing to undo since cpu_exec_init() hasn't been 
> > called */
> >          cpu_list_unlock();
> >          return;
> >      }
> 
> -- 
> David Gibson                  | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
> david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au        | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ 
> _other_
>                               | _way_ _around_!
> http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson



-- 
Eduardo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]