qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 for-2-12 09/15] s390x/tcg: implement TEST PEN


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 for-2-12 09/15] s390x/tcg: implement TEST PENDING INTERRUPTION
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:32:58 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0

On 11.12.2017 19:01, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:47:34 +0100
> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> Use s390_cpu_virt_mem_write() so we can actually revert what we did
>> (re-inject the dequeued IO interrupt).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  target/s390x/helper.h      |  1 +
>>  target/s390x/insn-data.def |  1 +
>>  target/s390x/misc_helper.c | 53 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  target/s390x/translate.c   |  8 +++++++
>>  4 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
>>
> 
>> +uint32_t HELPER(tpi)(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t addr)
>> +{
>> +    const uintptr_t ra = GETPC();
>> +    S390CPU *cpu = s390_env_get_cpu(env);
>> +    QEMUS390FLICState *flic = QEMU_S390_FLIC(s390_get_flic());
>> +    QEMUS390FlicIO *io = NULL;
>> +    LowCore *lowcore;
>> +
>> +    if (addr & 0x3) {
>> +        s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, 4, ra);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
>> +    io = qemu_s390_flic_dequeue_io(flic, env->cregs[6]);
>> +    if (!io) {
>> +        qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
>> +        return 0;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (addr) {
>> +        struct {
>> +            uint16_t id;
>> +            uint16_t nr;
>> +            uint32_t parm;
>> +        } tmp = {
>> +            .id = cpu_to_be16(io->id),
>> +            .nr = cpu_to_be16(io->nr),
>> +            .parm = cpu_to_be32(io->parm),
>> +        };
> 
> That's a two-word interruption code; can you call this something better
> than 'tmp'?

IMHO from the context we have here it should be pretty clear what is
happening. I mean we are defining and initializing the temporary data
structure.

But I can change the name if you can come up with a catchy variable name. :)

Thanks!

> 
>> +
>> +        if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, 0, &tmp, sizeof(tmp))) {
>> +            /* writing failed, reinject and properly clean up */
>> +            s390_io_interrupt(io->id, io->nr, io->parm, io->word);
>> +            qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
>> +            g_free(io);
>> +            s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
>> +            return 0;
>> +        }
>> +    } else {
>> +        /* no protection applies */
>> +        lowcore = cpu_map_lowcore(env);
>> +        lowcore->subchannel_id = cpu_to_be16(io->id);
>> +        lowcore->subchannel_nr = cpu_to_be16(io->nr);
>> +        lowcore->io_int_parm = cpu_to_be32(io->parm);
>> +        lowcore->io_int_word = cpu_to_be32(io->word);
>> +        cpu_unmap_lowcore(lowcore);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    g_free(io);
>> +    qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
>> +    return 1;
>> +}
>> +
>>  void HELPER(tsch)(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t inst)
>>  {
>>      S390CPU *cpu = s390_env_get_cpu(env);


-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]