qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [Process] QEMU submaintainers and pull req


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [Process] QEMU submaintainers and pull requests
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:13:18 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 03:03:07PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 February 2018 at 14:53, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On 16/02/2018 12:25, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 16 February 2018 at 11:18, Cornelia Huck <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> The block folks are already doing this, so we should just
> >> formalize what they're doing at the moment I guess. From my point
> >> of view as long as there's something I can easily filter
> >> in/out in the email body or subject so I don't get confused
> >> (and which doesn't require me to update my filters every time
> >> a new subsystem switches to using submaintainer pulls!)
> >> I don't mind about the rest of it. Maybe a subject line with
> >> 'PULL SUBSYSTEM s390x' (ditto block, etc etc) ?
> >
> > What about just requiring you to be in the "To" or "Cc" fields?  That
> > works pretty well for Linux.
> 
> It would require existing submaintainers to change their process,
> though -- currently not all pull requests are to/cc me.

All this time I thought it was /already/ required to cc Peter on
pull requests !

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]