qemu-stable
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-stable] [PATCH 153/156] vnc: Fix tight_detect_smooth_image() for l


From: Michael Roth
Subject: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH 153/156] vnc: Fix tight_detect_smooth_image() for lossless case
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 12:19:04 -0500

From: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>

VncTight member uint8_t quality is either (uint8_t)-1 for lossless or
less than 10 for lossy.

tight_detect_smooth_image() first promotes it to int, then compares
with -1.  Always unequal, so we always execute the lossy code.  Reads
beyond tight_conf[] and returns crap when quality is actually
lossless.

Compare to (uint8_t)-1 instead, like we do elsewhere.

Spotted by Coverity.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <address@hidden>
(cherry picked from commit 2e7bcdb99adbd8fc10ad9ddcf93bd2bf3c0f1f2d)
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <address@hidden>
---
 ui/vnc-enc-tight.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/ui/vnc-enc-tight.c b/ui/vnc-enc-tight.c
index e6966ae..59b59c0 100644
--- a/ui/vnc-enc-tight.c
+++ b/ui/vnc-enc-tight.c
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ tight_detect_smooth_image(VncState *vs, int w, int h)
     } else {
         errors = tight_detect_smooth_image16(vs, w, h);
     }
-    if (quality != -1) {
+    if (quality != (uint8_t)-1) {
         return (errors < tight_conf[quality].jpeg_threshold);
     }
     return (errors < tight_conf[compression].gradient_threshold);
-- 
1.9.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]