[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH for 2.6.0] net: vmxnet: check fragments count a
From: |
Dmitry Fleytman |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH for 2.6.0] net: vmxnet: check fragments count at pkt initialisation |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Aug 2016 11:16:13 +0300 |
> On 10 Aug 2016, at 23:05 PM, P J P <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> From: Li Qiang <address@hidden>
>
> When Vmxnet device initialises the pkt, the maximum fragmentation
> count is not checked. This could lead to an integer overflow
> causing a NULL pointer dereference. Add check to avoid it.
>
> Reported-by: Li Qiang <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/net/vmxnet_tx_pkt.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/net/vmxnet_tx_pkt.c b/hw/net/vmxnet_tx_pkt.c
> index 32563d4..e58b0a3 100644
> --- a/hw/net/vmxnet_tx_pkt.c
> +++ b/hw/net/vmxnet_tx_pkt.c
> @@ -55,9 +55,13 @@ struct VmxnetTxPkt {
> uint8_t l4proto;
> };
>
> +#define VMXNET_PKT_MAX_FRAGS 16 /* ref: MAX_SKB_FRAGS in kernel driver */
> +
> void vmxnet_tx_pkt_init(struct VmxnetTxPkt **pkt, uint32_t max_frags,
> bool has_virt_hdr)
> {
> + assert(max_frags <= VMXNET_PKT_MAX_FRAGS);
As far as I see max_frags for VMXNET3 is a size of device’s TX ring so this
will always assert.
I don’t think we need this limitation in the device code. Maximum number of
fragments is an internal knowledge of network backend.
~Dmitry
> +
> struct VmxnetTxPkt *p = g_malloc0(sizeof *p);
>
> p->vec = g_malloc((sizeof *p->vec) *
> --
> 2.5.5
>