[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qsos-commits] qsos/apps/tpl-xuleditor/chrome/content format.x...
|
From: |
Raphaël Semeteys |
|
Subject: |
[Qsos-commits] qsos/apps/tpl-xuleditor/chrome/content format.x... |
|
Date: |
Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:45:32 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /sources/qsos
Module name: qsos
Changes by: Raphaël Semeteys <rsemeteys> 06/11/28 17:45:32
Removed files:
apps/tpl-xuleditor/chrome/content: format.xsl test.qsos
tests.html
Log message:
Removed
CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qsos/apps/tpl-xuleditor/chrome/content/format.xsl?cvsroot=qsos&r1=1.1&r2=0
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qsos/apps/tpl-xuleditor/chrome/content/test.qsos?cvsroot=qsos&r1=1.1&r2=0
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qsos/apps/tpl-xuleditor/chrome/content/tests.html?cvsroot=qsos&r1=1.1&r2=0
Patches:
Index: format.xsl
===================================================================
RCS file: format.xsl
diff -N format.xsl
--- format.xsl 17 Apr 2006 21:12:49 -0000 1.1
+++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
-<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";>
- <xsl:output method="xml" indent="yes"/>
- <xsl:template match = "/" >
- <xsl:copy-of select = "*" />
- </xsl:template>
-</xsl:stylesheet>
\ No newline at end of file
Index: test.qsos
===================================================================
RCS file: test.qsos
diff -N test.qsos
--- test.qsos 17 Apr 2006 21:12:49 -0000 1.1
+++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
@@ -1,383 +0,0 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<document>
- <header>
- <authors>
- <author>
- <email/>
- <name/>
- </author>
- </authors>
- <dates>
- <creation/>
- <validation/>
- </dates>
- <language/>
- <appname/>
- <release/>
- <licenseid/>
- <licensedesc/>
- <url/>
- <desc/>
- <demourl/>
- <qsosformat>1.6</qsosformat>
- <qsosappfamily>test </qsosappfamily>
- <qsosspecificformat>1.2</qsosspecificformat>
- </header>
- <section name="generic" title="Generic section">
- <desc>Generic criteria from QSOS version 1.6</desc>
- <element name="intrinsicdurability" title="Intrinsic
durability">
- <desc>Intrinsic durability</desc>
- <element name="maturity" title="Maturity">
- <desc>Maturity</desc>
- <element name="age" title="Age">
- <desc0>less than 3 months</desc0>
- <desc1>if between 3 months and 3
years</desc1>
- <desc2>after 3 years</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="stability" title="Stability">
- <desc0>Unstable software with numerous
releases or patches generating side effects</desc0>
- <desc1>Stabilized production release
existing but old. Difficulties to stabilize developpement releases</desc1>
- <desc2>Stabilized software. Releases
provide bug fixes corrections but mainly new functionalities</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="historyknowproblems"
title="History, know problems">
- <desc0>Software knows several problems
which can be prohibitive</desc0>
- <desc1>No know major problem or
crisi</desc1>
- <desc2>History of good management of
crisis situations</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="forkprobability" title="Fork
probability, source of Forking">
- <desc0>Software is very likely to be
forked in the future</desc0>
- <desc1>Software comes from a fork but
has very few chances of being forked in the futur</desc1>
- <desc2>Software has very little chance
of being forked. It does not come from a frok either</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="toto"
title="tata"><desc>titi</desc><comment/><element name="totod"
title="dfdfdf"><desc>dfdfd</desc><comment/></element></element></element>
- <element name="adoption" title="Adoption">
- <desc>Adoption by community and industry</desc>
- <element name="popularity" title="Popularity
(related to: general public, niche, ...)">
- <desc0>Very few users identified</desc0>
- <desc1>Detectable use on
Internet</desc1>
- <desc2>Numerous users, numerous
references</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="references" title="References">
- <desc0>None</desc0>
- <desc1>Few refences, non critical
usages</desc1>
- <desc2>Often implemented for critical
applications</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="contributingcommunity"
title="Contributing Community">
- <desc0>No community or without real
activity (forum, mailing list, ...)</desc0>
- <desc1>Existing community with a
notable activity</desc1>
- <desc2>Strong community: big activity
on forums, numerous contributors and advocates</desc2>
- <score>2</score>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="books" title="books">
- <desc0>No book about the
software</desc0>
- <desc1>Less than 5 books about the
software are available</desc1>
- <desc2>More than 5 books about software
are available, in several languages</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="developmentleadership"
title="Development leadership">
- <desc>Organisation and leadership of
developments</desc>
- <element name="leadingteam" title="Leading
team">
- <desc0>1 to 2 individuals involved, not
clearly identified</desc0>
- <desc1>Between 2 and 5 independent
people</desc1>
- <desc2>More than 5 people</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="managementstyle"
title="Management style">
- <desc0>Complete dictatorship</desc0>
- <desc1>Enlightened despotism</desc1>
- <desc2>Council of architects with
identified leader (e.g: KDE)</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="activity" title="Activity">
- <desc>Activity of the project and around the
software</desc>
- <element
name="developersidentificationturnover" title="Developers, identification,
turnover">
- <desc0>Less than 3 developers, not
clearly identified</desc0>
- <desc1>Between 4 and 7 developers, or
more unidentified developers with important turnover</desc1>
- <desc2>More than 7 developers, very
stable team</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="activityonbugs" title="Activity
on bugs">
- <desc0>Slow reactivity in forum or on
mailing list, or nothing regarding bug fixes in releases note</desc0>
- <desc1>Detectable activity but without
process clearly exposed, loing reaction/resolution time</desc1>
- <desc2>Strong reactivity based on roles
and tasks assignment</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="activityonfunctionnalities"
title="Activity on functionnalities">
- <desc0>No or few new
functionalities</desc0>
- <desc1>Evolution of the product driven
by the core team or by user's request without any clearly explained
process</desc1>
- <desc2>Tool(s) to manage feature
requests, strong interaction with roadmap</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="activityonreleases"
title="Activity on releases">
- <desc0>Very weak activity on both
production and development releases</desc0>
- <desc1>Activity on production and
developmenet releases. Frequent minor releases (bug fixes)</desc1>
- <desc2>Important activity with frequent
minor releases (bugs fixes) and planned major releases relating to the roadmap
forcast</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="industrialisedsolution" title="Industrialized
solution">
- <desc>Industrialization level of the project</desc>
- <element name="independenceofdevelopments"
title="Independence of developments">
- <desc0>Developments realized at 100% by
employees of a single company</desc0>
- <desc1>60% maximum</desc1>
- <desc2>20% maximum</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="services" title="Services">
- <desc>Services offering</desc>
- <element name="training" title="Training">
- <desc0>No offer of training
identified</desc0>
- <desc1>Offer exists but is restricted
geographically and to one language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
- <desc2>Rich offers provided by several
contractors, in serveral languages and split into modules of gradual
levels</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="support" title="Support">
- <desc0>No offer of support except via
public forums and mailing lists</desc0>
- <desc1>Offer exists but is provided by
a single contractor without strong commitment quality of services</desc1>
- <desc2>Multiple service providers with
strong commitment (e.g: guaranteed resolution time)</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="consulting" title="Consulting">
- <desc0>No offer of consulting
service</desc0>
- <desc1>Offer exists but is restricted
geographically and to one language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
- <desc2>Consulting services provied by
different contractors in serveral languages</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="documentation" title="Documentation">
- <desc0>No user documentation</desc0>
- <desc1>Documentation exists but shifted in
time, is restricted to one language or is poorly detailed</desc1>
- <desc2>Documentation always up to date,
translated and possibly adapted to different target readers (end user,
sysadmin, manager, ...)</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="qualityassurance" title="Quality
Assurance">
- <desc>Quality assurance process</desc>
- <element name="quality" title="Quality
Assurance">
- <desc0>No QA process</desc0>
- <desc1>Identifies QA process but not
much formalized and with no tool</desc1>
- <desc2>Automatic testing process
included in code's life-cycle with publication of resulats</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="tools" title="Tools">
- <desc0>No bug or feature request
management tool</desc0>
- <desc1>Standard tools provided (for
instance by a hosting forge) but poorly used</desc1>
- <desc2>Very active use of tools for
roles/tasks allocation and progress monitoring</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="packaging" title="Packaging">
- <desc>Packaging for various operating
systems</desc>
- <element name="packagingsource" title="Source">
- <desc0>Software can't be installed from
source without a look of work</desc0>
- <desc1>Installation from source is
limited depend on very strict condition (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
- <desc2>Installation from source is
easy</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingdebian" title="Debian">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for
Debian</desc0>
- <desc1>A Debian package exists but it
has important issues or it doesn't have an official support</desc1>
- <desc2>The software is packaged in the
distribution</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingfreebsd"
title="FreeBSD">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for
FreeBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has
important issues or it doesn't have an official support</desc1>
- <desc2>A official port exists in
FreeBSD</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="packaginghpux" title="HP-UX">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for
HP-UX</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has
important issues or it doesn't have an official support</desc1>
- <desc2>A strong packaged is provided
for HP-UX</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingmacosx" title="MacOSX">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for
MacOSX</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has
important issues or it doesn't have an official support</desc1>
- <desc2>The software is packaged in the
distribution</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingmandriva"
title="Mandriva">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for
Mandriva</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has
important issues or it doesn't have an official support</desc1>
- <desc2>The software is packaged in the
distribution</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingnet" title="NetBSD">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for
NetBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has
important issues or it doesn't have an official support</desc1>
- <desc2>A official port exists in
NetBSD</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingnet" title="OpenBSD">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for
OpenBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has
important issues or it doesn't have an official support</desc1>
- <desc2>A official port exists in
OpenBSD</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingredhat" title="RedHat">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for
RedHat/Fedora</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has
important issues or it doesn't have an official support</desc1>
- <desc2>The software is packaged in the
distribution</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingsuse" title="Solaris">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for
Solaris</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has
important issues or it doesn't have an official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com
)</desc1>
- <desc2>The software is supported by Sun
for Solaris</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingsuse" title="SuSE">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for
SuSE</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has
important issues or it doesn't have an official support</desc1>
- <desc2>The software is packaged in the
distribution</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingwindows"
title="Windows">
- <desc0>The project can't be installed
on Windows</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it is
limited or has important issues or just cover some specific Windows release
(e.g: Windows2000 and WindowsXP)</desc1>
- <desc2>Windows is full supported and a
package is provided</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="exploitability" title="Exploitability">
- <desc>Exploitability level</desc>
- <element name="easeofuseergonomics" title="Ease of use,
ergonomics">
- <desc0>Difficult to use, requires an in depth
knowledge of the software functionality</desc0>
- <desc1>Austere and very technical
ergonomics</desc1>
- <desc2>GUI including help functions and
elaborated ergonomics</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="administrationmonitoring"
title="Administration / Monitoring">
- <desc0>No administrative or monitoring
functionalities</desc0>
- <desc1>Existing, functionalities but uncomplete
and or need improvement</desc1>
- <desc2>Complete and easy-to-use administration
and monitoring functionalities. Possible integration with external tools (e.g:
SNMP, syslog, ...)</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="technicaladaptability" title="Technical
adaptability">
- <desc>Technical adaptability</desc>
- <element name="modularity" title="Modularity">
- <desc0>Monolithic software</desc0>
- <desc1>Presence of hight level modules alowing
a first level of software adaptation</desc1>
- <desc2>Modular conception, allowing easy
adaptation of the software by selecting modules or even develeloping new
ones</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="codemodification" title="Code
modification">
- <desc0>Everything by hand</desc0>
- <desc1>Recompilation possible but complex
without any tools or documentation</desc1>
- <desc2>Recompilation with tools (e.g: make,
ANT, ...) and documentation provided</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="codeextension" title="Code extention">
- <desc0>Any modification requires code
recompilation</desc0>
- <desc1>Architecture designed for static
extension but requires recompilation</desc1>
- <desc2>Principle of plugin, architecture
designed for dynamic extension without recompilation</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="strategy" title="Strategy">
- <desc>Project's strategy</desc>
- <element name="license" title="License">
- <desc>License</desc>
- <element name="permissiveness"
title="Permissiveness (only if user wants to become owner of code)">
- <desc0>Very strict license, like
GPL</desc0>
- <desc1>Moderate permissive license
located between both extremes (GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the
type of user (person, company, ...) or their activities</desc1>
- <desc2>Very permissive like BSD or
Apache licenses</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element
name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks" title="Protection against proprietary
forks">
- <desc0>Very permissive like BSD or
Apache licenses</desc0>
- <desc1>Moderate permissive license
located between both extremes (GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the
type of user (person, company, ...) or their activies</desc1>
- <desc2>Very strict license, like
GPL</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright
owners">
- <desc0>Rights held by a few individuals or
entities, making it easier to change the license</desc0>
- <desc1>Rights held by numerous individuals
owning the code in a homogeneous way, making relicense very difficult</desc1>
- <desc2>Rights held by a legal entity in whom
the community trusts (e.g: FSF or ASF)</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="modificationofsourcecode"
title="Modification of source code">
- <desc0>No pratical way to propose code
modification</desc0>
- <desc1>Tools provided to access and modify code
(like CVS or SVN) but not really used to develop the software</desc1>
- <desc2>The code modification process is well
defined, exposed and respected, based on roles assignment</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="roadmap" title="Roadmap">
- <desc0>No published roadmap</desc0>
- <desc1>Existing roadmap without planning</desc1>
- <desc2>Versionned roadmap, with planning and
measure of delays</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="sponsor" title="Sponsor">
- <desc0>Software has no sponsor, the core team
is not paid</desc0>
- <desc1>Software has an unique sponsor who might
determine its strategy</desc1>
- <desc2>Software is sponsored by industry</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- <element name="strategicalindependence"
title="Strategical independence">
- <desc0>No detectable strategy or strong
dependency on one unique actor (person, company, sponsor)</desc0>
- <desc1>Strategical vision shared with several
other free and open source projects but without strong commitment from
copyrights owners</desc1>
- <desc2>Strong independence of the code team,
legal entity holding rights, strong involvement in the standardization
process</desc2>
- <score/>
- <comment/>
- </element>
- </element>
- </section>
-</document>
\ No newline at end of file
Index: tests.html
===================================================================
RCS file: tests.html
diff -N tests.html
--- tests.html 17 Apr 2006 21:12:49 -0000 1.1
+++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-<html>
-<head>
-<title>Template.js tests</title>
-<script type="application/x-javascript" src="Template.js"></script>
-<head>
-
-<body>
-<h3>Template.js tests</h3>
-<script type="application/x-javascript">
-
-function echo(text) {
- document.writeln(text+"<br/>");
-}
-
-var path =
"/home/raph/Documents/CVSLOCAL/qsos/apps/tpl-xuleditor/chrome/content/test.qsos";
-var myDoc = new Template();
-myDoc.load(path);
-
-echo(myDoc.getqsosappfamily());
-echo(myDoc.getqsosspecificformat());
-
-</script>
-<body>
-</html>
\ No newline at end of file
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Qsos-commits] qsos/apps/tpl-xuleditor/chrome/content format.x...,
Raphaël Semeteys <=