[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
address@hidden: Re: [Rapp-dev] Padding for binary morphing: (SIZE + 1) /
|
From: |
Hans-Peter Nilsson |
|
Subject: |
address@hidden: Re: [Rapp-dev] Padding for binary morphing: (SIZE + 1) / 2 or SIZE / 2?] |
|
Date: |
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 03:34:43 +0100 |
(I'm forwarding my copies of three messages missing from the
archives due to the recent backup restore: 3/3)
------- Start of forwarded message -------
From: Johan Almbladh <address@hidden>
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
No, if it is not already allowed I think we should keep the padding
requirements as they are today. It is always possible to relax the
constraints later, but not the other way around.
/Johan
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson <
address@hidden> wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:29:15 +0100
> > From: Johan Almbladh <address@hidden>
>
> > Also note that x and y padding sizes can be different if the SE is
> > asymmetric (3x7, 2x1), i.e. SIZE is width or height of the SE.
>
> Do you mean we should *allow* different padding sizes in width
> and height for those cases?
>
> brgds, H-P
------- End of forwarded message -------