[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RP] Re: Lightweight Web browsers
From: |
Jonathan Walther |
Subject: |
Re: [RP] Re: Lightweight Web browsers |
Date: |
Sun, 6 May 2001 16:37:16 -0700 (PDT) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Then they are broken. Linus doesn't bend over backwards to
make the linux kernel compatible with broken software; why
should ratpoison? Fix the source of the problem, not the
symptom.
On 29 Apr 2001, zhaoway wrote:
> but there're just too many of them. and many of them are useful
> too. besides gimp, there're imagemagick. for example. and there are
> plaympeg and xine which play very badly with ratpoison. RP wanna
> maximize them, but they don't like it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBOvXgLcK9HT/YfGeBAQGvXQQAoRy/czKykElAEtW2TglJki6Nr6pTQgZA
u0ZbHeI7xYRM0XLk7Q1J49wI0wPYtrzqZc3CYw3airrYaIaXJyW1qiL2kL1DUZMO
b34qAodrdnjrphvpRF28NjsHV05+6Nk+GBidoarknjxnB5Xl4yj/hH/29E8sC4H3
QRmWSrfddls=
=WBH7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----