Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance

[Scott Lamb]

On Feb 13, 2007, at 1:19 PM, Corey Puffalt wrote:

> In my particular case it was primarily CPU bound as you can see  
> from the time info.  The CPU was between 95-100% busy the whole  
> time.  This is what concerned me.  Having a backup program being IO  
> bound would hardly be a surprise to anyone.  Being CPU bound was  
> somewhat of a surprise to me.  Of course, for those of you with  
> 3.2Ghz versus 1Ghz machines are likely no longer CPU bound.

I saw your numbers, but they're for a repair of an existing  
filesystem, not a transfer. I'm not too surprised to see high CPU  
usage in your case - no network IO, and a command that may not have  
gotten as much optimization.

--
Scott Lamb <http://www.slamb.org/>