[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ruby-tut] Source layout question
From: |
Daniel Carrera |
Subject: |
Re: [ruby-tut] Source layout question |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:11:02 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
I'd say fr/ too. I haven't been able to touch the English version lately
because I am in exam period. So all my time is taken up studying.
Besides, Laurent is the Docbook expert here. I'd trust his XML before
mine. :)
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:24:14PM +0100, gabriele renzi wrote:
> looking at the cvs sources it shows up that the
> sources in beginner/en have a different organization
> from beginner/fr.
>
> Given that :
> -fr/ are _actually_ in xml
> -en/ should be the "original" sources
>
> Which one should I copy?
>
> I'd say fr/, cause I think in the english version,
> possibly, we have too much fragmentation.
> I mean, file.xml->chapter can be a 1:1 relation.
>
> Obviously, everything imvho, I'll follow whatever you
> say :)
>
> =====
> icq #69488917
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Cellulari: loghi, suonerie, picture message per il tuo telefonino
> http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/?http://it.mobile.yahoo.com/index2002.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-tut-developer mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-tut-developer
--
Daniel Carrera
Graduate Teaching Assistant. Math Dept.
University of Maryland. (301) 405-5137
--
en banc: en banc (ahn-BAHN) adjective, adverb
Having all the judges of a court present in a hearing.