[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Swap Brainstorm (was Re: [Rule-list] Test of 0.6.3-small - the whole
From: |
James |
Subject: |
Re: Swap Brainstorm (was Re: [Rule-list] Test of 0.6.3-small - the whole story) |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Feb 2002 21:57:03 -0800 |
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 00:51:32 -0500
Devon <address@hidden> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday 25 February 2002 12:37 am, James wrote:
>
> > > Don't try this anywhere near a production box, please? ;)
> >
> > Uh,,, the production box is about 3 feet away... far enough?
Seriously
> > though think it might work on that laptop I was trying out earlier?
If
> > so I'll bite.
>
> It may work. Worth a shot at any rate, no?
> Don't forget, before you load the updates disk, switch to <vt2> and:
> (This is for 2 disk installs)
> mknod /dev/hdb b 3 64
> mknod /dev/hdb1 b 3 65
> mkswap /dev/hdb1
> swapon /dev/hdb1
>
> For a single disk, I was going to try running fdisk, creating the
> partitions, and then enabling them as above.
> The mknod major and minor values for hda would be 3 0
> hda1 would be 3 1
> I haven't a clue if this will work on a single disk yet. That's a
project
> for tomorrow evening at this point.
>
> Good luck, let us know how it goes.
Will do and oh yes it will be a single disk try... I can only have one
disk in the laptop. So the bullet will be a biggie...
James
>
> - -D
>
> - --
>
> pgp key: http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/pgpkey.txt
>
> - --
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE8edDkeMAUbzJhSVcRAo+ZAJwNddNE7PH5LuSXIaZudlA+bxMXRgCdHlZv
> IGYmszzS9o0hD83bZVeGtjs=
> =WYiw
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rule-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list
- Re: [Rule-list] Re: Swap Brainstorm, (continued)
- Re: [Rule-list] Re: Swap Brainstorm, Martin Stricker, 2002/02/24
- Re: Swap Brainstorm (was Re: [Rule-list] Test of 0.6.3-small - the whole story), Chuck Moss, 2002/02/24
- [Rule-list] Re: Swap Brainstorm...., Marco Fioretti, 2002/02/24
- Re: Swap Brainstorm (was Re: [Rule-list] Test of 0.6.3-small - the whole story), Devon, 2002/02/25
- Re: Swap Brainstorm (was Re: [Rule-list] Test of 0.6.3-small - the whole story), Devon, 2002/02/25
- Re: Swap Brainstorm (was Re: [Rule-list] Test of 0.6.3-small - the whole story), James, 2002/02/25
- Re: Swap Brainstorm (was Re: [Rule-list] Test of 0.6.3-small - the whole story), Devon, 2002/02/25
- Re: Swap Brainstorm (was Re: [Rule-list] Test of 0.6.3-small - the whole story),
James <=
- Re: Swap Brainstorm (was Re: [Rule-list] Test of 0.6.3-small - the whole story), James, 2002/02/25
- Re: Swap Brainstorm (was Re: [Rule-list] Test of 0.6.3-small - the whole story), Devon, 2002/02/25
- Re: Swap Brainstorm (was Re: [Rule-list] Test of 0.6.3-small - the whole story), James, 2002/02/25
- Re: Swap Brainstorm (was Re: [Rule-list] Test of 0.6.3-small - the whole story), Devon, 2002/02/25
- Re: Swap Brainstorm (was Re: [Rule-list] Test of 0.6.3-small - the whole story), James, 2002/02/25
- Re: Swap Brainstorm (was Re: [Rule-list] Test of 0.6.3-small - the whole story), Martin Stricker, 2002/02/25
- [Rule-list] Device Major Minor numbers [was: something else], Devon, 2002/02/25
- Re: [Rule-list] Device Major Minor numbers [was: something else], Brock Organ, 2002/02/26
- Re: [Rule-list] Device Major Minor numbers [was: something else], Martin Stricker, 2002/02/26
- Re: Swap Brainstorm (was Re: [Rule-list] Test of 0.6.3-small - the whole story), Chuck Moss, 2002/02/25