[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Rule-list] graphical browser redux
From: |
hairylarry |
Subject: |
[Rule-list] graphical browser redux |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 20:38:41 -0600 |
Hi,
A skinny X terminal would be great for rule if we can find one that
runs well on 16 and 32 Meg machines. The likely candidates from
the Red Hat rpms are WindowMaker and icewm (or something like
that). WindowMaker is a gnu project and delivers a NextStep
interface. ice?? is one of the smaller window managers. They both
have configurator tools.
Does anyone have any experience with these or other thin clients?
Should we include vnc? For many environments installing rule as a
thin client on old hardware and then running apps from an app server
on one new machine could deliver good performance. Telnet, of
course. ssh? Then for graphic clients, vnc and an X terminal if we can
find one.
Other options for a graphical browser are browsers that use GTK+
and browsers that write to the linux framebuffer. I know of no rpms for
browsers like these.
I would like to support Martin in the use of rpms. I think any package
installed with rule and on the rule menu, so to speak, needs to be a
red hat rpm for support reasons. Red Hat can only support packages
in their distribution and this support is extremely important for newbie
sysadmins.
I do think we can include a listing of non supported programs that
someone has run successfully under rule. Especially if such a
program is as important as a graphical browser and there is no Red
Hat supported alternative. If we find such a beast we should make an
rpm and encourage Red Hat to include it. Then it could go on the rule
menu.
Anyone with other thoughts on thin clients and thin browsers please
post them. I will continue to research this area.
Thanks,
Hairy Larry
- [Rule-list] graphical browser redux,
hairylarry <=