Re: [Rule-list] Suggestion for modifying XFree86 and Tiny X

[Eugene Wong]

> From: Bill Crawford <address@hidden>
<snip>
>  That's a very tiny part of the code; and since the X server has to
> talk directly to the graphics hardware anyway, it has to take control
> of it at some point.
<snip>
> We used to start two X servers, one from each
> of two console logins, and switch between them ... that took ten or
> twenty seconds to swap the background image back in after a bit of
> work on the previous desktop.  Still quicker than starting straight
> from the console every time ...
<snip>
<snip>
> you probably won't be able to do much on the console until the server
> and window manager are finished starting up anyway :o)
<snip>
>  That background takes very little code to create, and is not stored
> as a graphic as such; it takes very little by way of resources;
<snip>
> If it doesn't set *something* as background then
> you either get random garbage or whatever was left from the previous
> X session garbled by use of the display memory by the console.
<snip>
<snip>
>  That's not such a bad idea, but the truth is that once you minimise
> a window, most applications will do absolutely nothing until you open
> the window again.
>
> ..."killall -QUIT netscape"..."kill -STOP"
<snip>

Thanks for replying and explaining the above information. Everything that is 
above, perfectly deals with my concerns. It all says to me, that yes, 
XFree86 is still efficient. I really appreciate it. Also, thank you for the 
"killall" and "kill" info. I never knew that before.

As disappointed as I am to see that my ideas won't come into fruition, I am 
glad to realize that you saved everybody a lot of time! :-)

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx