[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Rule-list] Miniconda, slinky, and other OSes
From: |
Marco Fioretti |
Subject: |
[Rule-list] Miniconda, slinky, and other OSes |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Mar 2002 14:39:46 +0100 |
Hello, all
what should we say if asked "will miniconda/slinky damage
my other Win *9x/NT/2K/XP partition"?
Most of our users are going to use Linux only, but even the
case above will probably be much more frequent that I initially
thought. Examples:
User wants to just *try* RULE, on some little space left
User cannot/doesn't want to remove other operating system
because it must remain there for any reason, from need of
software originally developed only for Win, or anything like
that.
The second category includes potentially all users going to RULE not
because they can't afford new HW, but because they feel right to cut
as much bells and whistles as possible, and must still share that only
PC with kids/wife/anybody using Win*.
Ideas? Suggestions for test cases?
Ciao,
Marco Fioretti
RULE project leader
- [Rule-list] Miniconda, slinky, and other OSes,
Marco Fioretti <=
- Re: [Rule-list] Miniconda, slinky, and other OSes, Gordon Buzowetsky, 2002/03/25
- Re: [Rule-list] Miniconda, slinky, and other OSes, Devon, 2002/03/25
- Re: [Rule-list] Miniconda, slinky, and other OSes, Gordon Buzowetsky, 2002/03/25
- Re: [Rule-list] Miniconda, slinky, and other OSes, Devon, 2002/03/26
- Re: [Rule-list] Miniconda, slinky, and other OSes, Martin Stricker, 2002/03/26
- Re: [Rule-list] Miniconda, slinky, and other OSes, Gordon Buzowetsky, 2002/03/27
- Re: [Rule-list] Miniconda, slinky, and other OSes, Devon, 2002/03/27
- Re: [Rule-list] Miniconda, slinky, and other OSes, Gordon Buzowetsky, 2002/03/27
- Re: [Rule-list] Miniconda, slinky, and other OSes, James, 2002/03/27