rule-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RULE] RULE files not yet reloaded on Savannah?


From: C David Rigby
Subject: Re: [RULE] RULE files not yet reloaded on Savannah?
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:24:55 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040312 Debian/1.6-3

I have not seen my last post from earlier today yet (hopefully there are no mailing list problems this morning) but in it I wrote erroneously:

My procedure for a kernel upgrade is to download the necessary RPMs for the architecture in question (usually this includes the CPU-specific AND i386 RPMs for other packages as well). For the example of my P5-100 notebook w/ 40 MB of RAM, I run rpm -Fvh kernel-2.4.20-30.9.i586.rpm, immediately followed by doing the same with rpm -Fvh --nodeps glibc-common-2.3.2-27.9.7.i386.rpm, then glibc-2.3.2-27.9.7.i586.rpm. I check the /etc/lilo.config file and run lilo. Then I reboot, and upgrade the rest of the relevant i386.rpm packages. I have not tried this recently on the really low-end system (486DX4-100, 16MB RAM).

This is (almost) the procedure I ran on the server, which is i686-based. There is no glibc-2.4.20-30.9.i586.rpm, nor openssl-0.9.7a-20.2.i586.rpm. Only the i686-based systems have a separate glibc & openssl packages.

So, for the pentium system:

rpm -Fvh kernel-2.4.20-30.9.i586.rpm, check /etc/lilo.conf, run lilo, reboot. Then rpm -Fvh --nodeps glibc-common-2.3.2-27.9.7.i386.rpm, followed by glibc-2.3.2-27.9.7.i386.rpm, then everything else.

For the i686-system, dual-processor system:

rpm -Fvh kernel-smp-2.4.20-30.9.i686.rpm, immediately followed by doing the same with rpm -Fvh --nodeps glibc-common-2.3.2-27.9.7.i386.rpm, then glibc-2.3.2-27.9.7.i686.rpm, then openssl-0.9.7a-20.2.rpm. I check the /etc/lilo.config file and run lilo. Then, reboot and perform the same procedure for the remaining *i386.rpm updates.

CDR
C David Rigby wrote:
The current kernel from RedHat updates is 2.4.20-30.9. It is one of the things that should be upgraded, since kernel bugs tend to have large impact, particularly on multiuser systems. I believe that the RH9 CDs include kernel 2.4.8-something.


Marco Fioretti wrote:

Marco & all,
The slinky-v0.3.96.iso & image files are on the test server here as well, and the md5sums match those Michael gives for slinky-v0.3.96.iso, slinky-v0.3.96.img, disk2.img, and pcmcia.img.



OK, great!


I am going to try to collect all of the relevant RPMs (updated RedHat ones as well as third party ones, as applicable) and create an iso of just those. So, since I have not gotten the complete install iso finished, one can use slinky-v0.3.96.[img|iso] to perform a RedHat install, then use rpm directly to update from the CD. Not pretty, but it should work.


Yes, this is good too, thanks. It also provides a way to RULE+RH9+updates
in parallel with your work.

One (maybe paranoid) question: would the kernel upgrade be in this
scenario different by one on vanilla RH9 on new PC?

Later,
Marco Fioretti



_______________________________________________
Rule Project HOME PAGE:  http://www.rule-project.org/en/
Rule Development Site:   http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/rule/
address@hidden
http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list



_______________________________________________
Rule Project HOME PAGE:  http://www.rule-project.org/en/
Rule Development Site:   http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/rule/
address@hidden
http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]