[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-cvs] [LicensingRequirements] (edit) mention LGPL*-only convers
From: |
karlberry |
Subject: |
[Savannah-cvs] [LicensingRequirements] (edit) mention LGPL*-only conversion to GPL, other English fixes. |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:29:03 +0000 |
??changed:
- Your license should be compatible with the GNU GPL, current version or
later. Exception: Affero GPL.
Your license should be compatible with the GNU GPL, current version or later.
(This includes LGPL*-only, since all LGPL versions can be converted to any
version of the GPL. Of course, we strongly recommend against using LGPL*-only.
And GPL*-only is not acceptable.)
??changed:
- These licenses are the ones that the GNU project use for its own projects,
and recommend for everybody else to use. They are also the most widespread, and
being incompatible with them is a practical problem, because you would then be
unable to combine code under those license with yours, and vice versa, even if
it is free software.
These licenses are the ones that the GNU project uses for its own packages,
and recommends for everybody else to use. They are also the most widespread,
and being incompatible with them is a practical problem, because you would then
be unable to combine code under those license with yours, and vice versa, even
if it is free software.
--removed:
- The Affero GPL is a license prototype, compatible with the current draft of
the GNU GPL v3. (Its goal was to deal with the issues with ASPs or Application
Service Providers - that is, offering free software legally through a web
interface, without giving the freedom to study, modify and share that software
to the end user.)
-
??changed:
- https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=4303 describes more
rational with requiring the GFDL for the manuals' license, and need to be
merged here.
-
- Your project depencies need to be compatible with the license you chose. This
is not really a Savannah requirement, but doing otherwise would make your
project legally inconsistent, and as such not freely usable.
https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=4303 describes more
rationale with respect to requiring the GFDL for the manuals' license (and
needs to be merged here).
Your project dependencies also need to be compatible with the license you
chose. This is not a Savannah-specific requirement, because doing otherwise
would make your project legally inconsistent, and as such not freely usable.
??changed:
- address@hidden, that is, the FSF Licensing Team, may offer suggestions to
find the best way to work around a legal issue.
-
- For non-software, non-documentation works, when we say "free" this refers to
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html . Licenses listed as "free" at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html (whatever the kind of work) are
good exemples.
address@hidden, that is, the FSF Licensing Team, may offer suggestions to find
the best way to handle legal issues.
For non-software, non-documentation works, when we say "free" this refers to
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html . Licenses listed as "free" at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html (whatever the kind of work) are
good examples.
--
forwarded from http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/address@hidden/maintenance
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Savannah-cvs] [LicensingRequirements] (edit) mention LGPL*-only conversion to GPL, other English fixes.,
karlberry <=