[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] [Savannah-register-public] [task #13715] S
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] [Savannah-register-public] [task #13715] Submission of Angel's Destiny |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Sep 2015 22:04:55 GMT |
<http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?13715>
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpenContentL declares the
Open Content License 1.0 as nonfree. I hope they've fixed whatever the
problems are.
The license must a a free license, as defined by FSF/GNU.
Not just free, but GPL-compatible. I'd say the license has to be in the
list at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses
(or be explicitly ok'd by FSF licensing). Wouldn't you? In fact, that
seems like something we could/should put into requirements.php.
Right now, we just say "Software licenses must be GPL-compatible.", but
I don't think it is within Savannah's purview to decide if a license is
GPL-compatible or not. If an author thinks their license is compatible,
but it's not listed, they should have to convince address@hidden, not
us. (Usually it's obvious that the desired license is incompatible.)
k
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] [Savannah-register-public] [task #13715] Submission of Angel's Destiny,
Karl Berry <=