[Savannah-hackers-public] Why don't we close group registration completely

[Jing Luo]

Dear something,

I wanted to see how group registrations were handled. I was speechless 
when I saw these comments from the tasks.

==============
    > I did explain the misunderstanding on the last time, but had no 
follow up.
    I'm sorry, I think I had no time.

    > What are you saying? That I'm banned or that I need to state a 
better reason?
    You filed exactly the same submission again, didn't you?  In my 
book, that doesn't count as learning one's lesson.
==============
https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/index.php?16489

===
    Savannah doesn't provide "just git repositories," repositories only 
come with groups in Savannah.  And sincerely speaking, I can't think of 
real cases where this program could be useful.
===
https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16293

======================
    > a vanilla MIT license.

    It looks like we don't listen to each other.  Too bad.
======================
https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16459

=====
    This submission is also likely to have other similar issues, but I'm 
afraid we have no common language to even discuss them.
=====
https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16390


Then this, as a result of such communication style.

========
    Hi ineiev,
    many thanks for your reply.

    I have decided to withdraw my submission from Savannah and will no 
longer renew my more-than-a-decade long membership to the FSF.
========
https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16254


Is this how we are supposed to talk to people? Do I need to point out 
the obvious problem here?

Since 90+% of the tasks are cancelled, why don't we just close group 
registration completely? That way we don't hurt GNU or FSF's reputation.

--
Jing Luo
About me: https://jing.rocks/about/
PGP Fingerprint: 4E09 8D19 00AA 3F72 1899 2614 09B3 316E 13A1 1EFC

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature