[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-hackers] Re: mldonkey licensing
From: |
MLdonkey |
Subject: |
[Savannah-hackers] Re: mldonkey licensing |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Aug 2002 01:26:42 +0200 (CEST) |
Sorry of disturbing you again,
> An undefined (by which I assume you mean unstated) license is always
> proprietary; the default is "all rights reserved".
The files are currently distributed in obfuscated form (2 obfuscated
files inside a 300 non-obfuscated files package). Is it possible to
put a restriction in the licence for the software to be GPL (ie
completely redistributable), with the only exception that these 2
files are distributed not in "the most readable form for modification"
(but still under other GPL terms), and only these two files. Would
such a software be considered as free-software ?
- Fabrice
- [Savannah-hackers] mldonkey licensing, Mathieu Roy, 2002/08/18
- [Savannah-hackers] Re: mldonkey licensing, MLdonkey, 2002/08/21
- [Savannah-hackers] Re: mldonkey licensing, Mathieu Roy, 2002/08/21
- [Savannah-hackers] Re: mldonkey licensing, Free Software Foundation, 2002/08/23
- [Savannah-hackers] Re: mldonkey licensing,
MLdonkey <=
- [Savannah-hackers] Re: mldonkey licensing, Free Software Foundation, 2002/08/26
- [Savannah-hackers] Re: mldonkey licensing, MLdonkey, 2002/08/27
- [Savannah-hackers] Re: mldonkey licensing, Mathieu Roy, 2002/08/27
- [Savannah-hackers] Re: mldonkey licensing, Loic Dachary, 2002/08/28
- [Savannah-hackers] Re: mldonkey licensing, MLdonkey, 2002/08/28
- [Savannah-hackers] Re: mldonkey licensing, Mathieu Roy, 2002/08/23