|
From: | Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: | [Savannah-hackers] Re: GNU Savannah migration from Savannah (the Software) to GForge - Why?! |
Date: | Thu, 15 Apr 2004 01:33:19 +0200 |
Hello Paul, Jim and Bradley, Could you answer my two questions? -- Sylvain On 2004.04.14 00:51, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
Hello, I would really like to understand the migration decision. We almost lost a volunteer because of this opacity. We now know Savannah|Savane is well maintained and not unsecure. Is the decision to migrate maintained considering this? Also, should the Savannah hackers be involved in this kind of decision? -- Sylvain PS: Richard, I wish you a full recovery for your imminent speech in France On 2004.04.11 04:34, Richard Stallman wrote:I'd like people to understand that we are not still considering the question. It is a final decision to switch to Gforge. I will give a brief explanation. We cannot continue using the Savannah software because we have no one to maintain it properly. GForge is maintained seriously. Therefore we will switch to GForge. I don't have time to discuss this further. I am in the hospital and falling behind on my other work.
----- Richard Stallman wrote:
We now know Savannah|Savane is well maintained and not unsecure. Our sysadmins reached a different conclusion; I am following their judgment in saying that Savane is not maintained securely in a way that we can use. I don't have time to try to study the code myself, nor time to learn the background knowledge our sysadmins already have. I will rely on their judgment.My arm (which was broken, and had surgery) got infected. I got out of the hospital Monday and left for a 6-week trip in Europe on Tuesday. I am far behind, so please don't ask me to spend any more time on this.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |