savannah-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Savannah-hackers] submission of UniPackage - savannah.nongnu.org


From: Sylvain Beucler
Subject: Re: [Savannah-hackers] submission of UniPackage - savannah.nongnu.org
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 19:38:49 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

Hi,

I have approved your project.  You will receive an automated e-mail
containing detailed information about the approval.

Regards,

-- 
Sylvain

On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 03:30:04AM +1000, Ben Myles wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks again, I've added copyright and license notices to all files
> now. You can get the new archive at
> http://download.berlios.de/unipackage/UniPackage-0.5.2.tar.bz2 .
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ben
> 
> 
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 17:09:11 +0100, Sylvain Beucler <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The file is still part of the files you will upload at Savannah and
> > needs appriopriate notices.
> > 
> > If a GPL program includes _a part of itself_ in its output, then the
> > output is bound to the GPL, hence the stated exception in the license
> > notice.
> > 
> > Since AppRun is very small you may want to use a simple all-permissive
> > license such as:
> > 
> >   Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification,
> >   are permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright
> >   notice and this notice are preserved.
> > 
> > If AppRun is improved and gets more features, I suggest you then use
> > the Bison skeleton-like license. In that case, I think it is
> > acceptable to strip off comments at run time before to include AppRun
> > in the output.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]