[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-register-public] Re: Fwd: [task #7761] Submission of Eye Saver
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
[Savannah-register-public] Re: Fwd: [task #7761] Submission of Eye Saver |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:41:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:29:10PM +0200, Alexander Shulgin wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2008 10:10 PM, Sylvain Beucler <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:26:34PM +0200, Alexander Shulgin wrote:
> > > Hi Sylvain,
> > >
> > > Glad to see you are back. :-)
> >
> > Hmm, there's a misunderstanding: I wasn't away. On the contrary, I
> > thought you still didn't get your Internet connection back.
> >
> > Is there a mail from you that I didn't answer?
>
> I've sent a mail in the thread on tpop3d approval on Feb 1 and one
> more on Feb 5--nothing particularly important, but since you haven't
> responded to these I guessed I should just wait for some more time.
OK, I think I was waiting for you and you were waiting for me. I'll
try to be more talkative next time.
> My connection issues are resolved now. However, can I reach you at
> #savannah on freenode if some of the mail gets lost in such a way
> again?
Yes, I often connect there around 20H-22H GMT. You can also ping me by
mail ;)
> > > This project seems compliant to our policies.
> >
> > It's very short and trivial... but if you think it's worthy of hosting
> > I don't have objection. It does sound like an actual project.
>
> As it's very short, the hosting won't hurt, IMHO. And who knows what
> it might evolve to eventually? :)
>
> > > Although, may be we should suggest the author releasing a tarball with
> > > a fulltext copy of GPLv3 included? Not sure is it _that_ necessary,
> > > however GPL FAQ suggests doing so for any project:
> > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhyMustIInclude
> >
> > Yes, that's part of our requirements: releases need to include a copy
> > of the license.
>
> OK, I'll approve it now with a mentioned remark.
Good.
--
Sylvain