[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-register-public] address@hidden: About RFCs]
From: |
Alexander Shulgin |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-register-public] address@hidden: About RFCs] |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:02:38 +0200 |
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 16:25, Sylvain Beucler <address@hidden> wrote:
> ----- Forwarded message from Mario Castelán Castro <address@hidden> -----
>
> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:02:48 -0600
> From: Mario Castelán Castro <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Subject: About RFCs
>
[snip]
> I understand and fully agree in this requirement for manuals and
> software documenation. but they do apply to standards too?.
>
> As I understand the IETF's legal terms, the RFCs can be reproduced
> verbatim, modification is not allowed, but considering they are
> standards they are not meant to be modified. Is the right to modify
> required to be considered free and uploaded to savannah?
Why do you need to *upload* an RFC? Isn't putting a URL in the docs
enough for your purpose?
--
Regards,
Alex