Re: [Savannah-register-public] [task #14106] Submission of Serpents

[jchmrt]

Hi,

Thanks for reviewing. I think you are right about the ubuntu font,
according to this wikipedia article[1], both debian and fedora have
reviewed the license as non-free.

I have chosen Lato as a replacement, which is licensed under the SIL
Open Font License 1.1[2], which is FSF approved[3].

Are there any other steps I should take for the project to get approved?

Thanks again,
Jochem


[1]:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_%28typeface%29#Ubuntu_Font_Licence
[2]:https://www.google.com/fonts/specimen/Lato
[3]:https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#SILOFL


On 2016-07-30 19:58, Hugh Mayfield wrote:
> Update of task #14106 (project administration):
>
>                   Status:                    None => In Progress
>              Assigned to:                    None => hlam
>
>     _______________________________________________________
>
> Follow-up Comment #1:
>
> Jochem, thanks for submitting.  The project looks fine, except for the 
> below.
>
> List: there is a font included in the tarball licensed under the 
> "Ubuntu Font
> License."  I can't see that this is either covered on the FSF's 
> commented list
> of licenses [1], or listed as license option on the Savannah project
> registration page.  The license does to my non-legal mind look like it 
> might
> be acceptable, but I don't want to approve before checking what we 
> should do
> in this situation - please advise.
>
> [1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html.en
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________________
>
> Reply to this item at:
>
>   <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?14106>
>
> _______________________________________________
>   Message sent via/by Savannah
>   http://savannah.gnu.org/