[Savannah-register-public] [task #14945] Submission of Extendable Read-Only File System

[Xiang Gao]

Follow-up Comment #33, task #14945 (project administration):

>This wasn't backed by facts, and even if true, I don't consider it really
relevant: having exceptions doesn't invalidate the rule. 

And I might repeat again,

the Savannah web pages currently don't express "Savannah requires GPLv3+
compatibility" directly, on: 
http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/HowToGetYourProjectApprovedQuickly/ 
or 
https://savannah.gnu.org/register/requirements.php

So I think if "Savannah requires GPLv3+ compatibility", it needs to be shown
explicitly, and I think there are no exception for these projects.

Currently, it just make a "For manuals" example and use the "recommend"
expression,
"For _manuals_, we _recommend_ GNU FDL version X-or-later, where X is the
latest released version of the FDL; other licensing compatible with that is
acceptable."

Actually, I have no idea of the _historical exceptions_ expression, "Savannah
requires GPLv3+ compatibility" is not pointed out explicitly yet, the
"history" I think is now.

Thank,
Gao Xiang


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?14945>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/