[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:56:21 -0600 |
Sounds like a good plan to me. I appreciate the fact that you're dropping the
-xx suffix, and that you're offering help with using git.
You need to let us know your Savannah username so we can put you on the project.
Eric
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> u.org] On Behalf Of Onno Kortmann
> Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 6:55 PM
> To: Joerg Wunsch
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started
>
> Hi all,
>
> Ok. I think there is a a way now that we could merge and
> abandon the fork.
>
> Let us book the knob/no-knob and similar discussions under
> misunderstandings (thats mostly my impression now, btw) and
> move on. I
> now propose the following hopefully very clearly:
>
> - I get developer access
>
> - Petr may want access, too(?)
>
> - Our patched simulavrxx will become the developer version of
> simulavr,
> and the other old C version will be made available as legacy
> C version
> of simulavr. The -xx will disappear into a historic footnote.
>
> - simulavr moves to git. If this is done, I offer to help, as
> far as I
> can, anyone to use git for simulavr. Send me eMails, phone
> me, whatever.
> The old code of course may stay in CVS/SVN, I do not care.
>
> - both Thomas and I get the permission to freely change and
> develop on
> HEAD. This may include big and incomplete changes. Things will break.
> (Look at our current git to get an idea on the size and
> short-to-long-term quality)
>
> - the web site and other documentation will be replaced with
> Thomas' new
> stuff.
>
> If you're too afraid of any of the above, I think it is in the best
> interest of all of us to keep our two trees.
>
> But in return, we will close the avrs and github version. If
> the above
> changes happen, I also volunteer to review all incoming patches that
> noone else looks at. My own development on simulavrxx is of course
> sporadically. But I will take the responsibility to review and either
> reject or merge abandoned patches.
>
> Best wishes :-)
>
> Onno
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Simulavr-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
>
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, (continued)
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Onno Kortmann, 2010/03/19
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Onno Kortmann, 2010/03/19
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/03/20
- RE: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Weddington, Eric, 2010/03/20
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/03/20
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/03/20
- RE: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Weddington, Eric, 2010/03/20
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/03/20
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/03/20
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Onno Kortmann, 2010/03/21
- RE: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/03/22
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Petr HluzĂn, 2010/03/22
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/03/22
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/03/22
Fwd: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, address@hidden, 2010/03/21
Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, address@hidden, 2010/03/22