[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sipwitch-devel] Starting
From: |
Lluís Batlle i Rossell |
Subject: |
Re: [Sipwitch-devel] Starting |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:59:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:24:10AM +0100, Steve Murphy wrote:
>
>
> On 01/20/2011 10:24 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> >
> >Am I doing something strange?
> >
> Yes, it is strange not to try the suggestion I made. It will take
> you 30 seconds to add this one line file and restart sipwitch. Make
> sure you let us know the result.
>
> I am telling you this because I had exactly the same problem, I
> also found the fedora thread you are pointing to, and actually told
> the thread maintainer of the solution ( but did not bother to join
> the fedora list).
>
> In the example sipwitch conf the <realm> is commented out, with
> the suggestion "GNU Telephony" - it has nothing to do with the
> "siprealm" . It is still commented out in my configuration file.
> It does not seem essential to get a basic system going - however
> /etc/siprealm seems to be.
Oh, I checked the code better. It first reads the <realm> tag and takes that as
realm. Only if <realm> is not defined, it checks (for the root user) in
/etc/siprealm.