|
From: | Jeremy T. Bouse |
Subject: | [Sks-devel] Question for other load-balanced SKS operators |
Date: | Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:07:14 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 |
So with the impending 1.1.6 Debian package being available I was taking another look at my server configuration. I found that one of my 3 nodes had gone brain dead but thanks to the cluster config it wasn't even noticed. I was going to take this time and rebuild the nodes to upgrade to 1.1.6 and increase drive resources as the DB has grown since I first deployed them. This also seemed like a good idea to revisit the configuration and see if it was optimal. I'm curious to hear from the other server operators who have load-balanced nodes how they have them configured to compare against my own configuration. I think when I deployed my cluster I believe Kristian was one, if not the only other, load-balanced server operators. A few things of interest, but feel free to include anything you have that I've not mentioned that you think improves your setup.
Regards, Jeremy |
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |