sks-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sks-devel] Unde(r)served HKPS [was: Underserved areas?]


From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Subject: Re: [Sks-devel] Unde(r)served HKPS [was: Underserved areas?]
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 23:49:13 -0500

On Sun 2018-01-14 18:23:59 +0000, Heiko Richter wrote:
> hardcoding a root certificate into a program has
> *never* been any kind of accepted security system.

pinning certificates (either end-entity or further up the chain) is
considered a good practice in a design where there is an expected
service that will be connected to, and that service has a known
certificate management lifecycle.

You see this regularly in mobile app development.  for example:

   
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15728636/how-to-pin-the-public-key-of-a-certificate-on-ios

GnuPG is not a mobile app, but it does ship with some built-in knowledge
about the keyserver pool, and it uses that knowledge *specifically* for
the sake of secure connections to the pool.

This is commonly-accepted best practice because it reduces the exposure
to all the rest of the CA cartel mishegas.

Many thanks to Kristian for managing the pool for so long!

   --dkg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]