Re: [Social-discuss] P2P or server approach?

[elijah]

On 03/24/2010 02:12 PM, Orton AKINCI aka .-_-. wrote:
> this system of wuala you mentioned looks like freenet's distributed storage 
> system

As I understand it, the key differences are:

(1) there is very limited permissions in freenet (you can grant read
access by sharing the content hash key, but you cannot revoke or have
groups with read and write access to a resource). afaik.

(2) freenet is free software, wuala is proprietary. So, wuala sucks. The
only reason to talk about wuala is to help imagine what kind of
easy-to-use clients can be build (as Blaine said, in the far future).

-elijah