[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?
|
From: |
Matt Lee |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:10:18 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 |
On 03/25/10 13:04, Ted Smith wrote:
> I fully agree with this - I see GNU Social as most optimally having a
> server daemon that does "real work" whatever that is, with UI's in
> various languages/models (web UI, GTK/Qt/Whatever UI, etc.). GNUnet does
> this, and I think it's the right choice.
GNUnet is not a good choice and it immediately breaks the design goal of
having this run on commodity webhosting.
That's why having it work in PHP with a minimal database is key.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?, Steven DuBois, 2010/03/24
Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?, Pablo Martin, 2010/03/25
Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?, Melvin Carvalho, 2010/03/28