Re: [Social-mediagoblin] New official git/contribution workflow docs

[Christopher Allan Webber]

I've made a small change to the workflow, suggesting that feature
branches contain both the issue number and the feature type.

http://docs.mediagoblin.org/git.html

issue_42->bug42_meaning_of_life

This is a lot more verbose, and you *can* just use the description or
the bug number (I'd prefer the description if you're going to do one or
the other), but if it's not too much trouble for you, it makes it easier
for me to manage if you can do both.

Does that work for everyone?

Thanks!
 - Chris

Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi all!
>
> Will Kahn-Greene, our emperor of documentation, has written a wonderful
> new section in the docs detailing the preferred way to handle pushing up
> contributions via git.
>
> Basically, we're encouraging feature branches (and as a fallback,
> accepting patches, hopefully via git format-patch).  Feature branches
> are easier for us to merge and keep things nice and clean and easier for
> you to maintain probably also.
>
> http://docs.mediagoblin.org/git.html
>
> Is this clear?  If you have any questions or suggestions for doc
> modifications, let us know.  And as always, feel free to discuss on IRC.
>
> Thanks again, Will!  And thanks again to all of you in the lovely
> community of contributors we're brewing here! :)
>
>  - Chris

-- 
The bottom line.