[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Spam-discuss] Buried
From: |
Luis Miguel Arteaga |
Subject: |
Re: [Spam-discuss] Buried |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 18:48:47 +0100 |
Paul Fisher wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 11:35:06PM +0100, Ward Vandewege wrote:
> > You are most likely not filtering out the spam on your end.
> > The GNU setup only tags spam messages with several header
> > lines starting with X-Spam. It does not block any message
> > from reaching you.
>
> This is how our anti-spam system is seutp. Luis, are you not
> receiving X-Spam headers on the emails you receive?
I did not know that those X-spam header were being sent already. I
don't look at them normally.
Now I am filtering those headers and reduced the spam to four or five
messages per day. It's much better but not yet ideal.
Anyhow, I am downloading all the messages on a costly internet
connection. Why don't we just delete messages with certain spam level
and above? Is there a problem with that?
Thanks to all who sent answers to my original message and specially
to those who are working on this.
/luis
--
-------------------------------------
Luis M. Arteaga
http://www.geocities.com/larteaga
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Spam-discuss] Buried,
Luis Miguel Arteaga <=