[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: whitelisting recipients
From: |
Dan Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: whitelisting recipients |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:38:51 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
In the last episode (Jun 04), Derek J. Balling said:
> On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 01:23 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
> >You clipped the bottom part of my original message off, which mentioned
> >that it'd be relatively easy to have spamass-milter add Resent-To: and
> >Resent-From: headers containing the envelope data before passing the
> >message to spamc. So no it currently doesn't pass the envelope info to
> >SA, but I'll add it :)
>
> But that's not a Resent-(To,From) situation. Maybe you want to add
> X-Rcpt-To: and X-Mail-From: headers?
>
> Resent-* headers are clearly defined for a given purpose and don't
> apply to what we're talking about here.
I originally wanted to use Resent-* because of all the special-casing
in Spamassasin that check for Resent-* /instead/ of other headers if
they exist. But I guess we do still want to check From: etc, so I'll
insert X-Envelope-From: and X-Envelope-To: headers, which SA should use
in addition to the other headers in the message.
--
Dan Nelson
address@hidden
- whitelisting recipients, Derek J. Balling, 2003/06/03
- Re: whitelisting recipients, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/03
- Re: whitelisting recipients, Derek J. Balling, 2003/06/03
- Re: whitelisting recipients, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/03
- Re: whitelisting recipients, Derek J. Balling, 2003/06/03
- Re: whitelisting recipients, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/04
- Re: whitelisting recipients, Derek J. Balling, 2003/06/04
- Re: whitelisting recipients, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/04
- Re: whitelisting recipients, Derek J. Balling, 2003/06/04
- Re: whitelisting recipients,
Dan Nelson <=