Re: [STUMP] asdf.lisp version

[Shawn]

Ivy Foster <address@hidden> writes:

> This is not a big deal, but I noticed we have an older version of
> asdf.lisp in stumpwm. I know there's an updated one available on its
> homepage, but...out of curiosity, why do we have one at all? Is it
> just to make sure everyone's using the same version?

It's because clisp doesn't come with asdf. It's loaded in the clisp
part of make-image.

> I've tested out building with the updated version locally, and had no
> errors on clisp. I should point out, though, that the *reason*
> I noticed stumpwm's asdf.lisp is out of date is that I happened to
> have the current one installed (and loaded by default in my
> clisprc.lisp), and got a build error when stumpwm tried to load the
> old one and found some incompatibilities.

I've updated the version. If there is a better way than bundling asdf
with stumpwm, I'd love to hear it.

-Shawn