stumpwm-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [STUMP] Crash Report


From: Eric Abrahamsen
Subject: Re: [STUMP] Crash Report
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 11:27:40 +0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)

Joseph Mingrone <address@hidden> writes:

> address@hidden writes:
>
>> Hi, I have received a crash. I haven't pasted the whole thing as I am not 
>> sure
>> if it is worth it. I am using an nvidia driver, and I was trying to clone the
>> display onto tv-out. There are warnings about the nvidia driver when I start 
>> the
>> system but it works ok most of the time. I usually extend the desktop rather
>> than clone.
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________________
>> ________
>>
>> The value NIL is not of type STUMPWM::FRAME.
>> 0: (SB-DEBUG::MAP-BACKTRACE
>>    #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA # :IN SB-DEBUG:BACKTRACE) {10082AF3EB}>
>>    :START
>>    0
>>    :COUNT
>>    100)
>> 1: (SB-DEBUG:BACKTRACE 100 #<SB-IMPL::STRING-OUTPUT-STREAM {10082AF313}>)
>> 2: (STUMPWM::BACKTRACE-STRING)
>> 3: (STUMPWM::PERFORM-TOP-LEVEL-ERROR-ACTION
>>    #<TYPE-ERROR expected-type: STUMPWM::FRAME datum: NIL>)
>> 4: (SIGNAL #<TYPE-ERROR expected-type: STUMPWM::FRAME datum: NIL>)
>> 5: (ERROR TYPE-ERROR :DATUM NIL :EXPECTED-TYPE STUMPWM::FRAME)
>> 6: (SB-KERNEL::OBJECT-NOT-TYPE-ERROR-HANDLER
>>    #<unavailable argument>
>>    #.(SB-SYS:INT-SAP #X7FFFF6E1ED80)
>>    #<SB-ALIEN-INTERNALS:ALIEN-VALUE :SAP #X7FFFF6E1E900 :TYPE (*
>>                                                                 
>> (SB-ALIEN:STRUCT
>>                                                                  
>> SB-VM::OS-CONTEXT-T-STRUCT))>
>>    (149 21))
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>> address@hidden
>
> This appears related to https://github.com/stumpwm/stumpwm/issues/71.

I'm pretty sure this is it, and pretty sure this is related to the bug
where removing an external monitor causes the same error. As far as I
know this was meant to be addressed by commit 8a59c9 "Head hotfix" on
the experimental branch, but no one seemed to understand the patch well
enough to make a decision about it!

Eric




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]