[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Swarm-Modelling] Question
From: |
Miles Parker |
Subject: |
Re: [Swarm-Modelling] Question |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:31:19 -0700 |
On Mar 20, 2008, at 5:39 PM, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
Miles Parker wrote:
I'd really want to be able to parse the isolated C bits, e.g. from
the xml, not the generated code -- dunno if that would be possible
w/ this approach.
The idea here would be to have the C/Java compiler write out a
suitably high level intermediate representation (e.g. as XML), and
then direct embed that in the model. The goal being completely
eliminate the need for opaque procedures, in favor of a
representation the model development environment could directly
manipulate.
Exactly, that is on the metaABM --> Flame side, right? That's "easy".
I was just thinking idly about the other side, though the use case
isn't really there..
_______________________________________________
Modelling mailing list
address@hidden
http://www.swarm.org/mailman/listinfo/modelling
- [Swarm-Modelling] Question, docgca, 2008/03/19
- Re: [Swarm-Modelling] Question, Marcus G. Daniels, 2008/03/19
- Re: [Swarm-Modelling] Question, Bill Northcott, 2008/03/19
- Re: [Swarm-Modelling] Question, Roshan D'Souza, 2008/03/19
- Re: [Swarm-Modelling] Question, Miles Parker, 2008/03/20
- Re: [Swarm-Modelling] Question, Marcus G. Daniels, 2008/03/20
- Re: [Swarm-Modelling] Question, Miles Parker, 2008/03/20
- Re: [Swarm-Modelling] Question, Marcus G. Daniels, 2008/03/20
- Re: [Swarm-Modelling] Question,
Miles Parker <=
- Re: [Swarm-Modelling] Question, Susheel Varma, 2008/03/24
- Re: [Swarm-Modelling] Question, Marcus G. Daniels, 2008/03/25
- Re: [Swarm-Modelling] Question, Miles Parker, 2008/03/25