Re: Brain protocol

[Juan J. Merelo]

OK:

>>>>> "glen" == "glen e p ropella" <address@hidden> writes:

    glen> -(id) think: (id);

Agreen on that. Good on the semantics, good on the syntax. What we
have now, then, is 

@protocol Brain
// Setting
-(id) think: (id);
// Using
-(char*) getBrainID;
@end

        Anything else? Anything missing? What about some kind of
feedback? Once the brain "decides", it should do something with the
results of that decision. That usually happens in neural networks,
where feedforward and training are separated. Besides, that feedback
might be needed to increase fitness.

        What about:
-(void) reThink: (id);    // Could be mull, or feedback.

        See ya!

                                JJ


-- 
address@hidden