swarm-support
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Windows 95 installation


From: Pietro Terna
Subject: Re: Windows 95 installation
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 15:15:44 +0200

        Rick,

        many thanks for your suggestions, useful to thing.

1. chmod does not modify permissions;

2. is not possible, in the Cygnus/w32 environment, to log as a specific
user (root or other):

3. another attempt changing the extension of configure:

BASH.EXE-2.01$ cp configure configure.bat
BASH.EXE-2.01$ ls configure* -l
-rw-r--r--   1 500      everyone   105913 Jun 25 10:25 configure
-rwxr-xr-x   1 500      everyone   105913 Jun 30 15:13 configure.bat
-rw-r--r--   1 500      everyone     4132 Jun 25 08:12 configure.in

seems to work, but

BASH.EXE-2.01$ configure.bat

gives

BASH.EXE: ./configure.bat: No such file or directory

        Pietro

At 07.26 30/06/98 -0400, you wrote:
>
>Pietro,
>When you say chmod "has no effect" do you mean
>it doesn't change the permissions, or that after the persmission
>is changed, you still can't get it to run?
>
>Assuming the former, perhaps you can't chmod because the
>file is owned by user 500, and you are not loged in as user 500?
>Maybe you could become root and change it?
>I know virtually nothing about bash in this cygnus/w32 environment,
>so maybe none of that makes sense (eg maybe there is no "root" user, 
>but that seems like a direction to think about.
>
> - r
>
>Rick Riolo                           address@hidden
>Program for Study of Complex Systems (PSCS)
>4477 Randall Lab                
>University of Michigan         Ann Arbor MI 48109-1120
>Phone: 734 763 3323                  Fax: 734 763 9267
>http://www.pscs.umich.edu/PEOPLE/rlr-home.html
>
>On Tue, 30 Jun 1998, Pietro Terna wrote:
>
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 10:28:23 +0200
>> From: Pietro Terna <address@hidden>
>> To: address@hidden
>> Subject: Re: Windows 95 installation
>> 
>> At 23.50 29/06/98 -0700, you wrote:
>> >>>>>> "PT" == Pietro Terna <address@hidden> writes:
>> >
>> >PT> Anyway, in a W32 environment, is it possible to run
>> >PT> 'configure' to obtain Makefile?
>> >
>> >Yes.
>> 
>> ok, but running configure in a W32 bash shell, I obtain
>> 
>> BASH.EXE-2.01$ configure
>> BASH.EXE: ./configure: No such file or directory
>> BASH.EXE-2.01$
>> 
>> a ls gives
>> 
>> BASH.EXE-2.01$ ls -l co*
>> -rw-r--r--   1 500      everyone    25439 Jun 24 02:36 config.guess
>> -rw-r--r--   1 500      everyone      299 Jun 22 23:49 config.h.in
>> -rw-r--r--   1 500      everyone    20714 Jun 24 02:36 config.sub
>> -rw-r--r--   1 500      everyone   105913 Jun 25 10:25 configure
>> -rw-r--r--   1 500      everyone     4132 Jun 25 08:12 configure.in
>> 
>> and any attempts to apply chmod to have configure of 'x' kind has no effect
>> 
>> 
>>      Pietro
>> 
>> 
>>                   ==================================
>>    Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
>>    to day usage of Swarm.  For list administration needs (esp.
>>    [un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
>>    with "help" in the body of the message.
>>                   ==================================
>> 
>
>                  ==================================
>   Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
>   to day usage of Swarm.  For list administration needs (esp.
>   [un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
>   with "help" in the body of the message.
>                  ==================================
>


                  ==================================
   Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
   to day usage of Swarm.  For list administration needs (esp.
   [un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
   with "help" in the body of the message.
                  ==================================


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]