[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ..
From: |
Marcus G. Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: .. |
Date: |
23 Oct 1998 08:48:03 -0700 |
>>>>> "SF" == Sandor Fazekas <address@hidden> writes:
SF> If I'm right the new Swarm (>1.3) does not have 'setDefaultOrder'
SF> method for 'ActionGroup'. How is then possible to set
SF> 'Sequential', 'Randomized' or 'Concurrent' ? Is there any new
SF> support for this feature ?
There never was an implementation of this feature, so I removed it from the
interface (and thus the documentation). Someone should implement it.
SF> I might be wrong but it seems to me that if someone makes a probe
SF> for a method with '(void)' return value and 'calls' it by clicking
SF> on the right place then the whole Swarm system aborts. Changing
SF> the return value to anything else this behaviour dissapears. I
SF> also tried 'setHideResult' but it gave me the same result.
Could you please copy these reports to address@hidden That way,
you can be sure they will be fixed.
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
==================================
- .., Sandor Fazekas, 1998/10/23
- Re: ..,
Marcus G. Daniels <=